As some of you might know, I'm in a couple of cover bands - one had been going for nearly 5 years, and the other is 2 years.
I've been getting increasingly frustrated with both of them - the 'main' band (the 5 year old one) had me doing everything; getting gigs, doing marketing, running Facebook, arranging the calendar and diaries, booking rehearsal, bringing spare cables etc. to gigs and so on.... Now this used to grate a bit, as the drummer was the only other one who would help and turn up on time, but I could deal with it. Now, however, the other guitarist has made himself unavailable pretty much every weekend fit the year, is completley unresponsive to emails, and seems to be learning the wrong versions and parts of songs (I'm tempted to say deliberately, but probably not).
I've asked him about it and he's just said he's busy.... But I work 13 hours a day, commute into London every day, have other hobbies and commitments and a second band - and yet I can manage everything.
I guess my question is - how do you know when it's time to call time on the band...? Just seems that if I didn't organise and push things, nothing would get done.
Sorry, rant over! I'd like to think you guys might understand where I'm coming from
Comments
I've recently left a band because it stopped being fun and we weren't making much progress. Last year we only played 4 shows and had one new song which to me wasn't good enough. We were all super talented musicians with tons of experience between us, yet the basic stuff like writing songs and rehearsing regularly was so hard for some reason. 3 of us were self-employed so we had a bit more flexibility in taking time off for stuff like tours and recording but we didn't do much of that. With the others working til 5:30/6pm and the rehearsal rooms being at least an hour away (we all lived in separate towns) we never really made weekday evening rehearsals work. And with 2 members having missuses they chose to use weekends to spend their time with them.
Weeks would go past and we'd do nothing, not even meet up as "people were busy". I'd try and get song demo'ing going but not once did it happen. We lost so much momentum people started to ask if we were still going. Also the inter-personal dynamics didn't feel right either which is another reason why I left. It just didn't feel like a group anymore, nothing I said was being heard/acted upon and I felt like a spare part.
I think in the end you know when its time to leave, if you didn't you wouldn't be writing the post!
Now...Im quite confident to turn up and play, the others want to practice it to death, which is fine...but you have to actually make time to do that !
We found ourselves doing nothing for weeks, then 4 nights full on practice before the gig....not fun...packed it in.
https://www.studiowear.co.uk/ -
https://twitter.com/spark240
Facebook - m.me/studiowear.co.uk
Reddit r/newmusicreview
The last couple of weeks or so it has REALLY turned into a pain in the arse. Couple of band members have had a major falling out and one is threatening to quit, but seeing as he's a drummer he's virtually gold dust (distinct lack of competent drummers in our area obviously) so I'm trying my best to make him stay. He's agreed but as long as he doesn't have to talk to our singer. What fun that will be. Like being a fucking primary school teacher sometimes. I've put a lot of time and effort into this band and we have a few gigs coming up as well as a steadily growing local following, so quitting is just not an option.
Only Bassist was "normal"and vocalist v other guitarist was a weekly pantomime because the other guitar was an over-sensitive fragile ego and the vocalist was a rude,arrogant and strange prick -a real pain in the arse.
I get that you've put a lot of hard work in and its beginning to show signs of bearing fruit, but be careful that you don't end up more disappointed in the future. If you've got two people in a band who don't talk, can you see it lasting? If you're the only one trying to get things patched up, what does that tell you about the other guys in the band and how much it matters to them?
'Quitting is just not an option' puts you in a very delicate position. I get that you don't want to pull out of the gigs that are arranged, but take stock before arranging any more. If its a ball ache, then why are you chasing it? Find others who care more.
My music:- https://soundcloud.com/hubobulous
That all changed when they both had major changes at work and needed to quit the band. Bassist also left, leaving me with the task of recruiting my own band and starting from scratch. Best thing that ever happened to me, bandwise.
Easier said than done, though. I have the advantage of the fact that wedding gigs pay well, so I was able to attract musicians on a level I just wouldn't have got if I had been offering pub band kind of money (and believe, me, I know that from experience too! No disrespect whatsoever to pub bands or pub musicians. I very much consider myself a pub-level musician punching above his weight here, in terms of the fees I get.)
The biggest problem IMHO is always leadership. Democracy only works if everyone agrees. Having a set leader only works if that leader can actually lead. There's always someone who doesnt learn the material, doesnt turn up to rehearsals, doesn't like the set, doesn't like someone etc etc.
I've led two bands so far and in each case did all the work. In both cases I ran out of enthusiasm.
Sometimes you have to put up with situations to function. The question is can you put up with them? If not leave, take the good ones or one with you and form a band.
I think the only frustration I go back to with my band is that it isn't quite the concept I had in my head. Unless I'm personally responsible for every element I guess it never will be but there is that constant falling short of that expectation. When I was in other people's bands that didn't matter so much. We do maybe 15 paid gigs per year which isn't huge but I know if I followed my vision it would be none and even the other musicians wouldn't turn up, but y'know...
I've said before that any successful band needs a driven person 9at all levels of the business). The likes of Ike Turner, James Brown, Mike Jagger etc. were big stars because of what they did off stage as much if not more than on stage. Plenty of people have 'talent' but that business sense with drive and organisation is what makes a band successful.
I've done the scene running a big band (8 piece) supplying and transporting the lights and PA, organising rehearsals and gigs, deps as applicable and replacements when people leave. Now I just turn up and play guitar in a different band, it's not all to my liking but I make suggestions and then shut up, someone else pulls it all together.
I'll never stop though. It's not exactly taking up every last minute of my free time, we practice once a fortnight on average and this is the first real band I've been in where I am able to play the genres of music I truly enjoy the most.
One of the unpleasant aspects of leading a band is breaking bad news to colleagues.
Precisely. You come across as one of life's self-starter, organiser/doer types whereas some of your band colleagues are followers. Unfortunately, some of those who follow will resent "being told what to do" by those with initiative. They may express their discontent via by uncooperative behaviour.
Think of The Cream. Theoretically, a democracy of equals. In practice, Jack Bruce earned more than Baker or Clapton because he contributed the majority of the song material. When challenged, Bruce very reasonably argued, okay, bring your songs, we'll do them. Deafening silence. Tumbleweed. Band collapses - partly under the weight of egos but, mainly, because of how the music industry preferentially rewards writers.
I couldn't stand practices as I knew he'd rock up late (dunno why he joined if he knew he lived up to 30 miles away) moan about the gear (he's got his own stuff which sounds good) and then about how tired he was before informing us who he shagged at the weekend. This is all before he took 20 minutes to noodle around to "get his sound".
Couple that with his complete reluctance to commit, for example we'd get offered a gig in say five month's time, and he'd say it was too far ahead for him to decide whether he wanted to do it. This would have been fine if he'd actually got us any gigs, but he never made any effort in that direction.
As expected, it came to a head, and we had a talk with him about it. He was totally unrepentant, and we carried on for a while before he told us he was quitting to join a punk rock band.
As it turned out, the particular band he'd joined was led by the guitarist, who was a total gig-slut, and he ended up doing two or three gigs a month, minimum. Seriously, you couldn't make it up.
It's a horrible situation; I've poured my heart and soul into this band - even designed T-Shirts for our tours etc. - but I think it's going to come to a head soon. As well as the other guitarist being difficult, the drummer only plays one groove, and never actually 'learns' the fills or unique parts of a song (i.e. - The Boys Are Back in Town is played as 4/4 rock instead of a bit of a swinging groove, and he can't play the drum fill in Town Called Malice during the break-down before coming back in to the verse).
I'll see how it goes, but my plan will be to not book any more gigs beyond what we have now, and then address the different issues face to face sometime soon. It kind of feels like leaving your first love
There is also no shortage of people who do not enjoy a high proportion of the material on their band's set list but lack the initiative to organise anything more satisfactory.
It is always easier to moan about things and wait for somebody else to make it better than it is to set about making practicable changes oneself.
Too many chiefs. Not enough Indians. Also, not enough bread in life's sandwich.