The Practice Studio Canteen: for your quick questions on Theory and Technique

What's Hot
bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
If you've got a quick question about theory or technique, post it here and the rest of us will help if we can, while we take a break from furious woodshedding in the practice studio :-)
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
«1

Comments

  • Here's something I wanted to ask which doesn't really warrant it's own thread...

    When you (bassists) play pull-offs, do you "pluck" the string with the top finger as it leaves? i.e. instead of just lifting the higher-fret finger vertically off the board, do you twang it sideways as it leaves so the string gets re-plucked for the lower-fretted note?

    It's a habit I seem to have from tapping on electric guitar, but now I find myself using it on bass because otherwise the lower note doesn't sound too clearly when I pull-off.

    Necessary technique or sloppy bad habit?
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • monquixotemonquixote Frets: 17588
    tFB Trader
    ChristophEar;1537" said:
    Here's something I wanted to ask which doesn't really warrant it's own thread...

    When you (bassists) play pull-offs, do you "pluck" the string with the top finger as it leaves? i.e. instead of just lifting the higher-fret finger vertically off the board, do you twang it sideways as it leaves so the string gets re-plucked for the lower-fretted note?

    It's a habit I seem to have from tapping on electric guitar, but now I find myself using it on bass because otherwise the lower note doesn't sound too clearly when I pull-off.

    Necessary technique or sloppy bad habit?
    I always flick my finger down when I pull off. You don't get a very well defined note if you just lift it. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
    ChristophEar;1537" said:
    Here's something I wanted to ask which doesn't really warrant it's own thread...

    When you (bassists) play pull-offs, do you "pluck" the string with the top finger as it leaves? i.e. instead of just lifting the higher-fret finger vertically off the board, do you twang it sideways as it leaves so the string gets re-plucked for the lower-fretted note?

    It's a habit I seem to have from tapping on electric guitar, but now I find myself using it on bass because otherwise the lower note doesn't sound too clearly when I pull-off.

    Necessary technique or sloppy bad habit?
    I always flick my finger down when I pull off. You don't get a very well defined note if you just lift it. 
    Me too, I flick downwards and away from the pickups towards the headstock.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700

    I'd flick the string too, like I do when guitaring (makes the string ring a bit more) not that I've played bass in a while.......

    BTW, Jon, that C#M9 in your sig, would that work in All along the watchtower? in place of the straight C#m? I'm guessing yes, but can't think ATM

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
     
    BTW, Jon, that C#m9 in your sig, would that work in All along the watchtower? in place of the straight C#m? I'm guessing yes, but can't think ATM

    Edited the quote to read C#m9 instead of C#M9 - there's an important difference! Yes, it would work well, especially in the breakdown section with the whammy-bar swoops, with a cleaned-up tone to let the adjacent D# and E pitches in the chord ring against each other
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700

    Thanks Jon, I shall try putting it in next time I play AATW,.

     

    It was only a slight typo, I did mean C#m9, not C#Major9, that would be wrong. Even by my standards........

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Cheers for the pull-off input! I'll keep doing it this way then.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
    While we're on the Kind of Blue subject bigjon, can you shed any light on the intro chords Bill Evans uses on Flamenco Sketches (or Peace Piece) ? I think it's the crowning glory of the album. 
    asked in the Chord of the week thread: any takers?
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_l said:

    Thanks Jon, I shall try putting it in next time I play AATW,.

     

    It was only a slight typo, I did mean C#m9, not C#Major9, that would be wrong. Even by my standards........

    FWIW I think use of "M" instead of "maj" (or the little triangle) in chord nomenclature should be totally banned. In handwriting it is far too easy to mistake for "m". Or you should say C#-9 for the minor chord ... but I loathe seeing "M" for when people mean major.
    "Working" software has only unobserved bugs. (Parroty Error: Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine!)
    Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
    edited August 2013
    While we're on the Kind of Blue subject bigjon, can you shed any light on the intro chords Bill Evans uses on Flamenco Sketches (or Peace Piece) ? I think it's the crowning glory of the album. 
    On first listen the first two chords sound like Cmaj7 followed by Dm7(/C), then he ladders up progressively higher voicings of a Cmaj9 chord where the top note tracks the successive notes of the the Cmaj9 arpeggio after the C, namely E then G, B, D.
       Nearest approx voicings on the guitar would be:
    Cmaj7 x3545x then Dm7 x5756x for the first two chords, then
    Cmaj9 ascending voicings x3545x, 8x998x, x35557 and 8 x 9 9 8 10
       I played piano for 10 years before I started on guitar, and beautiful tracks like these are when I'm glad I can still play, more fingers than five and more strings than 6 are needed! Hope that helps, @ourmaninthenorth :-)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • Thanks a million bigjon...
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
    @mike_l has requested help with a Queensryche song: having a listen now . . .

    mike_l said:

    I'm struggling with this, particularly the open chords, any help please

     

    or a live version

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10681
    Xxx230 Xxx231 Xxx233 Xxx010 Xxx011 Xxx010 :)
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • bigjonbigjon Frets: 680
    viz said:
    Xxx230 Xxx231 Xxx233 Xxx010 Xxx011 Xxx010 :)
    But when the guitarist is shown playing it in the video, he's clearly playing xx0530 for the first chord.
    And there appears (from the video!) to be an overdub of xxx78x for the third chord as well.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10681
    Haven't seen the vids coz on the train so doing it from memory, but that would seem a rather strange way of getting the G note - not to play it but to supplement the live track with a backing track. Perhaps it's all dubbed and he's just playing nonsense?
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700
    @viz @bigjon ; thanks guys  it was the last chord I was struggling with. I just couldn't get it right, no matter what I tried.

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10681
    The xxx010? Cool.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700
    the xxx010/xxx011/xxx010 part.

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10681
    Yep it's a C - Csus - C. The C is the same as a normal C without the bottom strings. The top 3 strings are the same shape as a D shape, 1 tone lower.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700
    edited September 2013
    bigjon said:
    viz said:But when the guitarist is shown playing it in the video, he's clearly playing xx0530 for the first chord.
    And there appears (from the video!) to be an overdub of xxx78x for the third chord as well.

    Both the guitarists are playing variations on the chords, I just couldn't figure out the last bit (C-Csus-C).

    The part I wanted to learn is the part Viz transcribed, as played by Michael Wilton.

    The other parts could quite easily be played by the second guitarist.

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.