It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/23/article-1268200-008F9B261000044C-429_468x286.jpg
Bloody hell, what sort of insect has balls as big as those?
I also didn't know pigs were omnivorous either!
Also chips are "Plant-based" no matter how you cook them.
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
I bet not a single non meat eater has ever heard that new and wonderful joke before.
Apart from that as I understand it:
With food chains carnivores tend to be smaller in number so are the least likely prey animals ( obvs not true of domesticated cats and dogs now)for us.
They usually need to be lithe so more sinewy to eat than grazing animals. Apparently a lot of carnivore meat is strongly flavoured and people tend not to like the taste.
As they eat other animals often including long dead ones they are more likely to have parasites and/ or suffer from bioaccumulation - animals get toxins from what they eat and then carnivores get the toxins from their prey. This is why sharks are considered inedible ( high risk of mercury poisoning) for example.
Breeding carnivores for meat has more impact on the environment - you have to grow plants to feed the prey animals which are then fed to the carnivores. The closer you get to just growing the plants the less impact you are having.