My next door neighbours had a driveway put in just before Christmas, but didn’t drop the kerb at the time (I believe the driveway was provided by the council and they weren’t able to drop the kerb at the time).
We live in an end of terrace house which we own, and there is a clear separation between our house and the neighbour concerned.
Yesterday, I arrived home from work to find that the council had been and dropped their kerb. In doing so, they had decided it would be best to drop the entire kerb from the edge of my property all the way across to my neighbours – effectively making one long driveway entrance. Although not my preferred way to have done this, I have no real issue with them doing that. personally I’d have preferred a small raised kerb section separating the 2 driveways, but hey ho.
Where I have an issue is the way the workers have tarmacced the area, having removed the grass verge in front of my neighbours house and dropped the kerb.
As you can see from the pics, they have come out at an angle which crosses over the invisible 'border' between our houses .
I am fully aware that my boundary stops at the end of the gravel driveway and that the area in question is technically the pavement which is obviously the council’s.
So my problem really boils down to the fact that the new tarmac area comes (partially) across in front of our house and gives the visual impression that next door’s driveway entrance begins on our property.
We’ve been carrying out work to our house with the intent on putting it on the market in the next month or so, but this is going to look pretty shite on the estate agent photos.
The night time photos were taken last night when I got home and saw it for the first time.
I look a daylight one this morning (the one with the wheelie bin!), and the ‘before’ shot is an old photo (2016) taken from Google Streetview.
Am I being unreasonable here? Part of me feels that perhaps I am…
I guess ultimately I’m just annoyed as this has come right at the time when all of our available funds have been put into doing the house up and we don’t have anything to allocate towards redoing the tarmac. I feel we should have been informed that this would affect the front aspect view of our house.
I’m assuming I have no grounds for complaint because the tarmac is on the ‘pavement’ area. Would this annoy any of you?
(and yes, I know my drive needs weeding - that's a job for this weekend!
)
Comments
Having said that given you have ample parking anyway I do wonder if its going to be something that real potential buyers are going to care about.
The Council did the easiest job they could as leaving one section of raised curb between the two driveways would have been more complicated. Given the number of slopes it would have left on the pavement I wouldn't be surprised if there are rules about how long a raised section between two dropped curbs has to be.
Secondly, once a few rain showers have washed away the dust from the new cut it will be a lot less obvious. You could even get a brush and hose out to speed matters up.
Thirdly, the pavement is not yours.
Fourthly, the weeds in your drive are a bigger problem!
You know all this already of course!
From the site below
"Most buyers will decide if they do or do not like a property before they even get out of the car and it can be hard to shake off negative first impressions created by a poor or unattractive exterior."
https://www.homebuilding.co.uk/20-sure-ways-to-add-value-to-your-home/
Not saying yours is unattractive by the way, just that when you're trying to sell you can put a lot of money on the property just by spending a small amount and in your case I don't think the tarmac is that much of an issue. The compromise with the council could be to just resurface the path outside your home to 'square it all up' a bit
I love the idea of relic'ing the pavement though - that'll make it worth more surely?
Ebay mark7777_1
If prospective buyers glance at it then just fold your arms and glare at them, they won't mention it then.
It is a non-issue- no one will decide against buying your house because of this.
I would concentrate on decluttering and staging the house inside, cleaning up the house outside.
Anything exterior can be sorted out by the new owners and they will mostly likely not notice it at all.
Most owner/occupiers shouldn't be present when showing the house as well- as they are only likely to draw attention to things like this (that more than likely won't be noticed by the prospective buyers) by way of an apology.
You have to realise that when someone first goes to your house they are mostly only seeing the big picture, not the small issues that might be there.
It usually takes 2-3 viewings to get the details and agents are good at patter, so any issues can be deftly dealt with, assuming you have a good agent.
Also, most people are thinking about the things they will change when they get in there, so all the little things you are worried about simply won't be an issue once you paint, rewire, remodel, knock down walls etc.
The tarmac will fade with time and will be unnoticeable, although hopefully you will have sold before then.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
Estate agency photographs are notorious for giving a selective representation of the truth of any property. They should be able to do exactly the same for you.
In my opinion, any potential house buyer who would be snotty about the appearance of the lowered kerb and relaid tarmac pavement is probably going to turn up his/her nose at the prospect of the entire street.
Converting front gardens to off-road parking is increasingly common. Stick around long enough and your neighbour on the other side will be doing it too.
This will not affect the sale of your house.