It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I am also intrigued by the parlour sized guitars. Was thinking of picking one up but am still considering a big baby taylor.....
All the above have been professionally converted to left-handed (bridge/saddle, nut and fretboard side dots) without any impact on the tone or playability.
Couldnt really call an L00 a parlour but people seem to have no problem calling a , for example Oscar Schmidt grand concert, one.
Guess at the end of the day it will depend on what the marketing department think is the best niche to put it in.
When it comes to lower bouts and widths, according the Martin sizing and models it's as follows
D/0000 - 16"
000/OM - 15"
00 - 14"
0 - 13"
Parlours - less than 13"
FWIW, I think there are a huge differences when it comes to playability and sound when it comes to models of different lower bout widths eg between an OM & 00 or a 00 & 0.
Size
Since there was no legitimate standard for parlor guitar building, luthiers varied the size of their creations to a degree. Even when there is no standard size imposed, many consider having a lower bout that is smaller than 13.5", or smaller than Martin Guitar's "0" shape, to be the historically correct size for parlor guitars. However modern day production parlor guitars don't necessarily follow this size limitation and are much more varied, with some guitar manufacturers labeling even bigger "00" size guitars as parlor, including those with a lower bout of 14". It should be safe to say that "00" size and below are viable parlor style guitars.
That just gives the best tone for me
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after you