It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
I'm planning to buy one of these
Anyone played one?
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
let us know how you get on. It's a great website by the way - all that info about tunings.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts. Depends on whether you want semi hemi demi phlegmy frets or not.
Since I have never found it to be a significant problem and no one I know or respect as a player has bothered their arse then there are almost always bigger problems that need fixing
Straight frets work, and have worked for over 300 years, plus I have never listened to an album and thought "ooh that guitar needs to be intonated"
Snake oil to me, plus it looks like my daughter has drawn all over a guitar neck!
Looks like its melted a bit.
Mind you, I hadn't realised that it warranted that much adjustment in the frets.
Someone posts: I think I will buy some latest FX or amp sim gadget that is not a 1950s valve design
others post:
I have one, it's great
I don't like that one
it's overpriced
I prefer valve amps
etc
Whereas, strangely to my mind, when someone posts: I think I will buy some latest guitar that challenges 1950s designs
others post stuff like:
Guitars work fine without this new feature
This is not needed
It does not work
It's a con
Any issues with tuning or intonation are irrelevant, it's the attitude in the playing that matters more (i.e. the punk ethos)
Why are people so comfortable about new ideas for amps and FX, but so conservative about guitars?
Not sure about the oboe, surely any instrument with fixed pitch notes will have to select a temperament that will inevitably not work well for some scales?
Lutes had movable frets before and after 300 years ago, to address this exact issue
Some days a few chords sound really out of tune for me on guitars, other days it is not so prominent for me
Personal tolerance for intonation and temperament issues varies from person to person. As I've stated before, I do not believe that being unable to detect or notice this is any kind of advantage for a musician. A bit like a more accurate sense of taste/smell is essential for a wine maker, but admittedly possibly a costly burden for a wine drinker
Here's some non-guitar examples of the effects of temperament:
see if you agree with the person who made this video
I'm keen to experience playing this, but obviously don't expect it to work for all circumstances
My perspective is to have different guitars for different purposes, and different tunings for that matter
Re oboe, yes and indeed it's not only the issue of the notes being fixed, because fixed, equal temperament does give an equally reasonable approximation for all keys (see piano) - it's also the fact that the pitches are based on the fundamental resonance of the instrument, so are better in the fundamental key than in others. I agree TT frets may be pointless and even detrimental (eg bending), but it is nevertheless a very interesting concept and I'm sure it does get rid of some of those odd sounding tones on the G or B strings - we've probably become inured to them but a true temp guitar could open our ear(s) to pure tones again. I'd love to try one and hear for myself.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
As it says in the FAQ:
"What happens when True Temperament guitars are used with other guitars, bass, piano etc?
Our THIDELL FORMULA 1™ temperament works just fine together with “ordinary” instruments. The offsets from Equal Temper are not so severe that they normally create dissonance.
So the changes are there if you listen carefully, but aren't so obvious that playing alongside a 50s Strat you can hear a dissonance between the two.
Also if the points on the frets (that the strings vibrate from) need to be so precise then any significant fret wear will move the point of string vibration, so that will have to be dealt with regularly to be sure it's still in perfect playing order. I also know from countless setups on guitars that with a very accurate tuner it's quite possible to sharpen or flatten a note with very little finger movement, so to make the most of this your technique would need to be very good, or any sloppy finger placement might negate the change the fret has made. I'd also imagine a smooth bend would sound interesting, but I've never encountered such a neck, so have no experience.
I have known people to be overjoyed with the change the Buzz Feiten system can make to a guitar, so if you have an ear for such subtle changes I'm sure this neck would also be a great improvement over standard necks. However most people (and I include myself in this) don't hear the imperfections quite so clearly, and wouldn't need the improvement this provides.
So my feeling with this innovation is that for me, the extra hassle it introduces out weighs the benefits it brings.
1) Not invented here - anyone investing enough time learning at things fears that being overturned.
2) Static mindset - some people believe their achievements define them not their ability to adapt.
3) Whilst it's massively undervalued - we really do decide a lot based on touch and changes to that frighten some people.
4) The disbelief that we'd settle for anything less than the ideal solution. (sort of acknowledges our own eventual redundancy).
Ultimately it boils down to one thing "what if I can't change" ... pretty much everything that gets piled on top of that is a discount of some sort: discount the existance of the stimulii - "I can't hear a difference" ... the significance of the stimulii - "I can hear a difference but it's not going to make a difference", the possibility for change "it'll never take off so I won't bother with it" and the possibility for personal change "I'd never be able to use it"...
It is scripted and, as you indicate, it's predictable and because of that, for the most part it's not authentic, people are feeling something and running away from that feeling... and burying why they're running away from it, especially from themselves, then the brain's interpreter kicks in and says "you don't like that, let me think of about 20 reasons you don't like that" and a false rationale is created.
I didn't like playing modelling guitars because it scared the crap out of me, it sounded more authentic than I did, but I still felt it sounded false... so what did that say about my playing? These days I think modelling guitars are good for the stock sounds I think of as cliched but are exactly the sounds I like in the guitar.. because a lot of my playing is cliched - partly because I practise stuff lots and it mioght not sound as fresh or original to me now.