Please help to settle a disagreement

What's Hot
close2uclose2u Frets: 997

I'm practicing the Stevie Nicks song Dreams from Rumours.

I reckon that the chord progression is simply F to G and back to F.  The F chord is sometimes F major7, sometimes F add9 ... and the G chord is sometimes G7.  I play one, and one only, bar of A minor in the 2nd repeat of the instrumental guitar part.

So, I have it in C major / F lydian if thinking in modal terms. (G mixolydian at a push is also possible).

Our keyboard player, playing a piano part from a music score reckons it is in A minor and he plays arpeggiated Am to G to F to G repeatedly (with some additional notes making those chords in to 9s etc).

The melody is pretty much centred around the notes C and A and the others in a pentatonic C, D, E, G, A (C major pentatonic or A minor pentatonic - you take your pick).

C Major is the parent of F lydian, G mixolydian and A minor.

But I do not hear / see / think the song as A minor at all.

What do you reckon?

0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
«13

Comments

  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700

    Depends on how you think about music.

    I mostly think in minor keys, so would go with Am.

    Someone who mostly thinks in major keys would go with C major.

    As the melody is centred around C and A either would work in theory.

    There is an Am chord but no C major.....

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • I reckon it's in A minor, but that's the same as C major key-signature-wise.

    (This is why I subscribe to the logic that music is best written without worrying about theory...)
    The Assumptions - UAE party band for all your rock & soul desires
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    edited November 2013
    With 2 major chords a tone apart (F and G), given that chord 1 has a major 7 and chord 2 has a dominant 7, and the fact that the fist chord is the lower one and the 2nd is the higher one, there are only 2 options, C major or A minor.
    But it's definitely in A minor because the chorus proves it by using the A minor as the tonic, which she lands on the so often. It's also a mournful melody. It's A minor.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700

    @viz  ; WTF is a "fist chord"?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    %-(

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • close2uclose2u Frets: 997

    All for A minor so far ....

    I took a lot of persuading towards F Lydian from this article - specifically from page 111

     

    http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=gamut

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • I think of it as being in the key of C maj | A min (same thing as far as I'm concerned). :)
    It's mostly re-enforced by the fact that most melodies (either vocal or guitar) are using the corresponding pentatonic scale.
    I don't get why your keyboardist would be playing an arpeggiated Am to G though, it is not in any version of the song I've heard.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • GulliverGulliver Frets: 848
    I would label it as F Lydian rather than A Minor or C major. 

    The reason for this that the F chord is the one that feels like 'home' - so build everything based on that premise and you're in Lydian-town baby!!
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • octatonicoctatonic Frets: 33791
    edited November 2013
    I would go with A minor- but without playing it (which I can't do right now) C major could work as well.

    Lydian is a mode, not a key- you can't have a piece of music in the key of F Lydian for this reason.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • close2uclose2u Frets: 997
    edited November 2013

    I know that Lydian is a mode not a key.

    In strict terms Aeolian is a mode but we do allow ourselves to have music in minor keys.

    I know that it's all the white keys on a keyboard.

    I know that if it's called C Major then it is just a piece with a missing tonic.

    I don't think that one A minor chord in the progression should define the key.

    That said, the melody doesn't stray too far away from a pentatonic and only occasionally brings in an F note ( for a tonic note if F lydian) or a B note (for a #4 to really define lydian).

     

     

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    edited November 2013
    I think Lydian is a scale not a mode! as is Aeolian, as is Ionian. Ok they are modes of each other but I believe that's irrelevant, they are scales in their own right. But you are right, they are not keys. But they are scales. Just like the word Aegilopa is a word (it's an 8-letter word and it means ulcer of the eye - and funnily enough, each letter is higher than the last, apart from the last letter which returns to the first - a bit like the Ionian scale in C: CDEFGABC). And the 2nd mode of aegilopa is egilopae, but it's not only the 2nd mode of aegilopa, egilopae also a word in its own right (it's the plural of a flour ingredient, mentioned in an old french recipe book) - and even the 3rd mode of aegilopa, gilopaeg, is a "word" - it's someone's email address so it doesn't need to be described just as the 3rd mode of aegilopa, it can also be described as someone's email address. ilopaegi is obviously well known in the phrase "las presuntas imputaciones detenida Carmen iLopaegi" hahahaha! love it. Lopaegil was mentioned in the San Fransisco chronical in 1901 as we all know; opaegilo is not just the 5th word of aegilopa, it's also someone's grandfather. And paegilop is also a word, as we all know, in the studies of edgar polome. Anyway, so I think it was A minor.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ToneControlToneControl Frets: 11889
    viz said:
    I think Lydian is a scale not a mode! as is Aeolian, as is Ionian. Ok they are modes of each other but I believe that's irrelevant, they are scales in their own right. But you are right, they are not keys. But they are scales. Just like the word Aegilopa is a word (it's an 8-letter word and it means ulcer of the eye - and funnily enough, each letter is higher than the last, apart from the last letter which returns to the first - a bit like the Ionian scale in C: CDEFGABC. And the 2nd mode of aegilopa is egilopae, but it's not only the 2nd mode of aegilopa, egilopae also a word in its own right (it's the plural of a flour ingredient, mentioned in an old french recipe book) - and even the 3rd mode of aegilopa, gilopaeg, is a "word" - it's someone's email address so it doesn't need to be described just as the 3rd mode of aegilopa, it can also be described as someone's email address. ilopaegi is obviously well known in the phrase "las presuntas imputaciones detenida Carmen iLopaegi" hahahaha! love it. Lopaegil was mentioned in the San Fransisco chronical in 1901 as we all know; opaegilo is not just the 5th word of aegilopa, it's also someone's grandfather. And paegilop is also a word, as we all know, in the studies of edgar polome. Anyway, so I think it was A minor.
    what a spectacular essay
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    edited November 2013
    Can't quite believe I wrote that. I'd been to an event with a lot of wine. Took me ages to find an 8-letter word with ascending letters and ending on the first letter - and still can't really believe all 6 modes of it actually exist!
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • octatonicoctatonic Frets: 33791
    edited November 2013
    Viz, you nutter! ;)

    The scale/mode, although tertiary to the original question, is an interesting one.
    You can think of it either way and that will largely be a cultural difference.
    If I had of written 'Lydian is a scale, not a key' I am certain someone else would have said 'It is a mode, you moron'.

    I think it comes back to how you learned music.
    If you come from a classical background you learn that the major scale is the mother of all music, the natural minor is derived from the major scale and the modes of the major scale are just that, modes.
    Most people will know this but for those that don't- in the classical tradition you play the natural minor descending differently from how it is played ascending.

    If you learn music from a popular music or jazz perspective then you might well consider modes to be scales and the natural minor as a scale in its own right- you ascend the same as you descend. Also, the modes, especially Dorian, Mixolydian and Lydian, are played as scales in their own right.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    Re playing melodic minor up and aeolian down, that's right, and that's why the melodic minor is so called, becase it is "melodic" to raise the 6th and 7th when ascending to the tonic, and it's also melodic to flatten them to their natural positions when descending - it's how those dudes thought of choons.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • octatonicoctatonic Frets: 33791
    edited November 2013
    viz said:
    Re playing melodic minor up and aeolian down, that's right, and that's why the melodic minor is so called, becase it is "melodic" to raise the 6th and 7th when ascending to the tonic, and it's also melodic to flatten them to their natural positions when descending - it's how those dudes thought of choons.
    At music school we were taught that it was to avoid the tone and a half jump that is inherent in the harmonic minor.
    The melodic minor was created as a modification to the harmonic minor, rather than being derived from the natural minor.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    Oh absolutely, you're right about the evolution :) I just mean that's why they call it melodic minor, because you raise the 7th on the way up, as a leading note, and you raise the 6th too (to avoid the 1.5 step), because that's how melody was written, and on the way down you don't need it, because you're not leading up to the tonic, you're coming away from it so you revert to the natural minor; and the harmonic minor was so called because it's aligned with the chords that make up typical minor harmony.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700

    @viz isn;'t that the "Jazz scale" that you've described? so the intervals are the same ascending and descending, which gives different notes?

    It might just be my understanding, but the natural minor has the same notes as the major, and the harmonic minor has the same as the major, apart from the (in the minor) 7th note is raised by a semi-tone?

    EG using Cmajor/A minor

    C major  C-D-E-F-G-A-B-C

    Am  A-B-C-D-E-F-G-A

    Am harmonic   A-B-C-D-E-F-G#-A

     

    Or am I completely wrong and need to go stand on the naughty step?

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    edited November 2013
    Well I don't know about this jazz scale stuff (and the ascending melodic minor has a natural 2 and minor 3, but a raised 6th and 7th, so playing its inversion would be a flattened 2 and minor 3, so ike a phrygian, and playing the aeolian inversion would have a natural 2 and major 3, so like Ionian, so if that's what you mean, then no I don't think so.
    But most importantly, I don't think we should think of the minor scales as being related to the major (in the same key, I mean; obviously A minor is related to C major), but as follows:
    Aside from knowing what the tonic is, the first thing to know is, is it major, or minor? That's fixed by the 3rd note.
    Then if it's major, it's either a standard Ionian major (natural 4th, major 7th), or it's Lydian (augmented 4th) or it's mixolydian (flattened 7th).
    If it's minor, it's either natural minor, " Aeolian" (natural 2, natural 6, natural 7), or it's a deviation, for example dorian (raised 6), phrygian (flattened 2), melodic (raised 6 and 7 if playing ascending), or harmonic (raised 7, causing an augmented 2nd at the top).
    I do not agree with the strange convention of saying "melodic minor is basically ionian with a flattened 3rd"; it's more correct to say "melodic minor is basically aeolian with a raised 6 and 7" - BECAUSE the distinction between major and minor is so damn important that, after noting what key the scale is in, it's the first thing to note. It's the primary differentiator. So it doesn't make sense to describe any diatonic minor scale in terms of deviations from any major scale. They should be described in terms of deviations from their natural minor.
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • vizviz Frets: 10689
    By the way there are only 3 symmetrical heptatonic scales using just tones and semitones - the dorian, the neapolitan major scale (starts phrygian and ends ionian), and the hindu scale (5th mode of melodic minor, the one which starts major and ends aeolian).
    Roland said: Scales are primarily a tool for categorising knowledge, not a rule for what can or cannot be played.
    Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • mike_lmike_l Frets: 5700
    Ok naughty step for Mike then. :)

    Ringleader of the Cambridge cartel, pedal champ and king of the dirt boxes (down to 21) 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.