It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
https://www.ecb.co.uk/news/651365
Many of the names aren't household names to the average punter but it's clear how commercially orientated this board is.
when I heard the news earlier today, my initial reaction was similar to the above....what a joke!
having read a little more about it - I actually think it’s not so bad.
1) the 8 team city format competition will be on terrestrial tv (this is so needed)
2) for those not interested in cricket/don’t understand, having a 100 ball count down makes sense. Not to mention for sponsors and marketing.
my concerns:
die hard traditionalist (I used to book days off work just to listen to the cricket on TMS)
They should revamp the 20/20 in England to city based. Scrap this whole 100 ball thing and replace the current 20/20 competition with a city based franchise and glorify it like the IPL
and Australian BBL. Im sure a few rich investors would see the potential.
too many formats....and sadly test cricket is dying.
they should do that test championship that they have talked about for years yet not done anything about it.
As for Ed Smith as selector - I enjoy his commentary. He can’t do any worse than the outgoing selector. We are all better selectors than those in charge....but some very funny selection decisions the past few years.
https://sixstringsupplies.co.uk/
Our YouTube Channel for handy "How-To" Wiring Tutorials
1)Yes, cricket is needed on terrestrial television. When the new tournament starts in 2020, it'll have been 15 years since the 2005 Ashes. 15 years of limited exposure.
2) If people are that uninterested in cricket that 100 balls is needed to keep it sensible for them, why would they then pay out for tickets? The BBL has KFC as their principal sponsor, the IPL had Pepsi, current IPL sponsors include giants like Nokia and Hewlett Packard. None of those sponsors have asked for a 100 ball countdown.
3) Why should our T20 tournament be city based? As a Somerset fan who lived in Bristol, I know that both Gloucestershire and Somerset got good crowds in, and not just for the derby games. Somerset may well be the best T20 wicket in the country for run making. Bristol is also a really booming city, somewhere that links Taunton and Cardiff. Keeping everything at Cardiff means a huge swath of the country would have no franchise games under your notion where the London-Hampshire region would have three venues in a comparatively small geographical region.
4) "Sadly Test cricket is dying" - and why is that? it's because the Test format has been eroded thanks to people who are going for money first through the shorter formats. Touring sides get close to no decent acclimatisation time on tour now (in the good old days, a touring side would play counties and Minor County sides. These were excellent ways for players to get used to conditions, bed themselves in, and the games were frequently played at non-first class venues and brought good punter numbers in. Instead you get tours where you play a few composite sides with 13 players per side and then bang straight into a Test series. It's why most sides are rubbish away from home now: we get smashed in India and Australia, we smash them over here.
Our 2005 Ashes winning side were better than any side England have had since and the high quality of Championship cricket was the reason for it. It bred the right mentality for Test cricket. It's why you had openers like Trescothick and Strauss go from county cricket and succeed internationally. In Tresco's case, he was averaging mid 30s in Championship cricket but Duncan Fletcher thought he had the right stuff to succeed. Compare their career to some of those who have come and gone at the top of the order. A list of Cook's partners makes for some long reading. The County Championship has been butchered. England players seldom play, the quality is poor, and the scheduling is utterly ludicrous.
This might sound grumpy but Australia suffer from the same problem. Look at how many openers they've been through in recent years. The Sheffield Shield ran from 26th October to the final starting March 23rd. There are six sides who play 10 games each before a final match between the top two. On paper that seems a very long time period to play 10 to 11 games but they shut up shop this year and had a break. From December 19th to Feb 4th, it was the Big Bash. Just as in England, the shorter format tears up the longer format.
Now many have advocated we do away with some county teams and that a smaller number of teams will make for better quality of players produced. I say bullshit to that and point to Australia. Six state sides, a grade system that is far weaker than before, a focus on T20 cricket, a fucked about first-class fixture list, and the end product is a men's team that is very inconsistent. In short, just like us.
A Test Championship is simply pissing in the wind if you don't respect the first-class game.
Not impressed with the new selectors.
Buttler in the test team?? Malan at 3??
They would be better off relieving Bairstow of the gloves so he can concentrate on batting, and playing Foakes.
Bring back David Graveney or Geoff Miller.
The Cricinfo article on it said Malan would bat 3.
I can't see Buttler doing much against a moving red ball in May.
Dominic Bess has some real potential but he's not an attack leading bowler. His first class career has mostly been on turning tracks at Taunton. Once again we seem to have gone for a young spinner when our track record with young spinners is absolutely bloody awful, from Schofield to Borthwick to Kerrigan. One thing that needs to be crystal-clear is what England expect from him, whether it's a real containing job or if he's got the backing to mix it up.He really needs to have the confidence to set out what he wants as I don't get the feeling from Root that he is that great as a bowler's captain.
Buttler is clearly being seen as the number 7 powerhouse.
Cricinfo says Root will bat at 3 with Malan at 4, Beeb says the same.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/23509854/jos-buttler-dom-bess-earn-england-calls-james-vince-dropped
One wonders whether Root volunteered to go 3 or whether he's been rather shoehorned into it. Woakes and Wood fight it out for the last spot, Wood should win that.
WALOFS
However, since we wil stop playing red-ball cricket in about ten minutes and will be playing tip-and-run for, oooh, months, he's not actually going to get much red ball game time.
Lords isn't always seam friendly as the last CC match showed. Going into a Test with Broad, Jimmy, Woakes, Wood, and Stokes would be very one-dimensional. If it tips it down for days before the game, then all seam is a possibility but it's been lovely here in London the last few days and more is promised.