It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
1) Repairability
2) Space between components for cooling and to reduce interference
3) Not having all electrical signals in parallel lines is meant to reduce cross-over noise
But if you want to it's actually possible to make a PCB amp with both these things - some companies do, even if most choose to go the other way and minimise cost.
Other than that it's largely snobbery.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
All the above, plus some less tangible things, like maintaining the skills necessary to do that kind of thing which then adds to the pool of people who can also repair things down the line.
Supporting local business, producing less landfill, maintaining a skills base of technicians who can repair things, resulting in less environmental impact, societal and economic benefits. Life would generally be better if we all owned fewer, better quality things and valued them more.
There's a lot to be said for having a relationship with the person who made your amp (or whatever it is) in that you can often tailor things to suit your preferences when things are made in small volumes. Then there's pride of ownership from having something unique, or nearly so.
The amps themselves are often better sounding. Not always, and as ICBM says, a good PCB can be just as good. However, most manufacturers change the design to the limits imposed by PCB, rather than copying the handwired layout. This compromises component and audio quality IMO. The first Marshall PCBs were direct copies of the turret board layout, with the same components; sounded great and easily repairable ad infinitum. Now they're all squeezed into a much smaller area with a load of SM switching and soon-to-be obsolete ICs in the rest of it.
That's my take. It's not for everyone, and there are some obvious disadvantages. It's nice to have the option!
"Easy repairabilty" I would question a bit. If the PCB is of good quality (and the tech has a modicum of skill)
Then there is no contest in fact it is more difficult to leave 'boutique' and pretty amp looking untouched than a good PCB jobbie*.
From the SONIC point of view again, nowt in it IMHO except that a PCB design will be more consistent sample to sample. The biggest argument for PCB (but not SMT but we have to be realistic if we want all the bells and whistles at sensible prices**) is the cost. Said it before but I do wish a certain mnfctr of my acquaintance would make a version of their turret wired amps in a GOOD quality PCB design with a sstate rect, therefore cheaper PT.
*If you have to replace a PT e.g. (and anything can go buzzy!) and it is laced in 'Wireman' style, your only option really is to chop and splice the wires, shrink sleeve and hide the work!
**I think there should be a law! All SMT kit should be available as a 'Service Replacement' to bona fide techs.
Dave.
Er? "Crossover noise"? Do you mean 'Crosstalk'? If so not possible in a mono amp and would be so far under noise, not a bother in stereo either.
Parallel wiring could cause coupling. Either noise, heater hum say. or instability and squegging. Can get that with badly designed PCBs of course.
But! I do agree with MJW in that we need to maintain skills and repair MUCH more stuff, not just amps, because we shall soon need another fucking planet!
Dave.
You can make a PCB amp with obvious care and attention to detail as well - look inside a Mesa for example.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
As someone who has to fix SM stuff (because outside of guitar amps everything is SM) I would say it is a pain in the arse but once you work out a few techniques and get some appropriate tools it's not too bad. As time moves on repairers will have done SM repairs from the start and won't be familiar with through hole stuff maybe and certainly not valves.
I don't have much experience in making valve amps but I imagine there aren't machines that can bolt on a transformer and wire it, or valve bases etc .... that must still be done by hand ?
For a rubbish collection in a box, look nside a marshall dsl.
I know this will cause howls of protest, but actually a Hiwatt is not the be all and end all, even of handwired amps. The laying out of everything in neat straight lines with the wires all bunched together is actually *bad* practice if you're concerned about minimising crosstalk and stray capacitance, which is one of the common criticisms of PCBs. A Hiwatt layout duplicates that to quite a large extent. It *is* consistent - it's notable that Hiwatts vary less from one example to another than Marshalls for example - but as Dave said, that's one of the prime advantages of PCB.
It's also worth mentioning that all reliability-critical, cost-no-object electronic systems in use now such as military, avionics and medical equipment use PCBs.
True, but that's largely due to the low quality components, jumper connectors with flimsy ribbon cable etc.
Look inside a Jet City - a far cheaper amp - and you will see, if not quite a thing of beauty, certainly none of those problems.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Said company were happy to work on the cheap, were largely happy to accept the high failure rates and employ lots of labour in the Far East to fix the failures before sending them on.
The point I'm trying to make is that if you are building amps based on PCB so that they can be mass produced in a part of the world with cheaper labour, are you testing each and every amp before you ship them? ..probably no more than a small % are tested.
There's no reason why you can't up the price point on a PCB design to get great quality, but that's not what a lot of companies are using this for.
Handmade amps put together in small numbers are more likely to be tested / soaked before they are sold and early failure less acceptable to the manufacturer / builder.
I know an amp builder in the US who drops every one of his amps from about 2 feet onto a table whilst they are up and running, to ensure that there are no issues or even an interruption / disturbance in sound - unlikely to get that when items ship by the container load!
If you’re building one-offs, by the half-dozen or so, and/or offering a high degree of customisation then the cost of designing PCBs, having them made, and programming a machine to populate the boards is going to be a lot higher than working out a turret/tag board layout and putting it together by hand (and that’s before you start considering multiple iterations of tweaking to get it just right).
That and being able to justify absurdly high prices to cork sniffers...
"laying out of everything in neat straight lines with the wires all bunched together is actually *bad* practice if you're concerned about minimising crosstalk and stray capacitance,"
Depends on what you bunch IC! Wires carrying DC, don't matter. Wires carrying AC matter since keeping them tight minimizes stray fields. If you look inside a Quad ll or even the solid state 303, works of art because the guys knew what they were doing. In any case every feedback amp will need a 'pole' cap somewhere so it makes sense to have V tidy wiring so that the capacitances are consistent.
Of course, if someone is daft enough to run OT anode wires across an input? WHEeeeeee!
At RF you have to go very 'point to point' . I have only very rarely changed a transistor in a UHF tuner and had the gain as good as it was before and that matters in Northampton because we get ***t reception from everywhere!
And! You would THINK a p2p amp and would HAVE to be tested? How then did an A100 get to me with a 220mfd 500V cap in the wrong way round! (yes, a bloody mess)
Dave.