Just had a call from 01215376329 (which seems to be a suspicious number) claiming to be from Sky and that we had problems with our internet. Now that would normally ring alarm bells except I am with Sky and we do have problems with our internet so go easy on me
He got me to search for validator in Safari on my iPhone which took me to
https://validator.w3.orgHe then asked me to put Sky.com in there and I got a series of html errors.
So is
https://validator.w3.org a legitimate site and was the string of Sky errors a ruse to convince me that they knew what they were doing? It was at this point that the alarm bells started to ring so I hung up.
Comments
providers wouldnt normally call you, let alone ask you to do things unless you're previously logged a fault call.
First thing to do, IMMEDIATELY - call Sky and check with them.
EDIT
just found this - so reading the top few paragraphs - looks like you escaped JUST in time
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-scam-callers-ask-you-to-go-to-validator-w3-org
"he validator is a tool for people who both understand and care about what the validator is telling them. For most people out there, it’s unimportant. It means that you did something in a non-standard way when you were writing your website, that’s all. Errors in the validator might mean that your page doesn’t load well for some users or whatever - a validator error does not mean there’s a gaping security hole in your email address.
The scammers are hoping you don’t know that. They want you to have seen the errors and warnings from the official-looking validator site they’ve sent you to, and then they want you to let them fix the issue - for which they’ll need your username and password. Or perhaps your credit card details. And your mother’s maiden name, the name of your first school and the street you lived on as a child…"
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
https://validator.w3.org is a legitimate site, but there's no reason why you should need to go there unless you are checking the validity of Web documents.
Entering a non valid web page (sky.com isn't one) with throw up errors like you described.
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-scam-callers-ask-you-to-go-to-validator-w3-org?share=1
https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/842
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
The w3 validator is useful, but you'd be a long while finding any site - commercial or otherwise - that passed with flying colours. I suspect the scammers know this full-well. It's an interesting hustle, I never thought I'd see the day that these cynical bastards would exploit a web dev tool for money. Hell knows what's coming next.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.