It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Accidents where the car goes airborne are always worrying - there’s literally nothing to slow it down other than aero drag.
This could be good news for the F1 team, as Ghosn only agreed to the F1 operation on the condition that costs were kept to a minimum.
Or it could be bad news, if the new boss decides he’d rather not spend hundreds of millions of Euro every year on an F1 vanity project..
Between him and Russell they should gain a couple of tenths without touching the car. And next year's car *has* to be better than this one, right?
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/kubica-williams-race-deal-2019/4301134/
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
The root cause of the problem was that the car’s aero performance on track was wildly out of kilter with what the simulator was telling them. If they’ve resolved that, next year’s car should be much better. If not...
Didn't Alonso say something similar 12 months ago?
Given that several of the races this year genuinely resulted in me nodding off, I’m currently evaluating my options.
And besides, last year's Mclaren was actually quite drivable, just underpowered, so characteristically the other end of the scale from the Williams. Next year is surely a critical year for Paddy. I'm yet to be convinced he's been the driving force (no pun intended) behind the successful cars on his CV.
https://www.williamsf1.com/racing/news/2018/11/williams-martini-racing-confirms-robert-kubica-as-race-driver-for-2019
There were some zingers in there, but Spain, France, Hungary, Singapore, Brazil, Belgium - Spa, for goodness sake - those were all excellent cures for insomnia.
Sky is weird.
I agree that next year is critical. They have to deliver.