I'm so angry right now... People should NOT be bullied because of what they wear...

randomhandclaps

Out of interest if a man and a woman meet, both drink heavily and sex occurs the woman either cannot recall giving consent or was deemed too intoxicated to give consent but sex occurs then the man could be prosecuteable for rape.  What however happens if both participants are men?  Has there ever been a case of a gay man being prosecuted for having drunk sex with another gay man who either does not recall giving consent or when it could be argued that he was too inebriated to give consent?

digitalscream

UnclePsychosis said:

Some really disturbing views on display here.

Giving a man a hard time for wearing an inappropriate shirt in a TV interview - unacceptable.

Raping someone - acceptable as long as you've both got a few beers in you.

Jesus wept.

The thing is, nobody's actually said that. The fact that you're choosing to read that into it either means you're struggling with reading comprehension (unlikely) or deliberately trying to be offended.

Drew_TNBD

UnclePsychosis said:

Some really disturbing views on display here.

Giving a man a hard time for wearing an inappropriate shirt in a TV interview - unacceptable.

Raping someone - acceptable as long as you've both got a few beers in you.

Jesus wept.

No one said that. You idiot. You absolute fucking idiot.

randomhandclaps

UnclePsychosis said:

Some really disturbing views on display here.

Giving a man a hard time for wearing an inappropriate shirt in a TV interview - unacceptable.

Raping someone - acceptable as long as you've both got a few beers in you.

Jesus wept.

OMG so what you are saying is that all men are potential rapists, especially when exposed to alcohol, and that Dr Matt Taylor should face public execution?

Edit - Apologies I think I may have ignored the finer details and any sense of reasoning in order to create a shock angle on your point.

frankus

randomhandclaps said:

UnclePsychosis said:

Some really disturbing views on display here.

Giving a man a hard time for wearing an inappropriate shirt in a TV interview - unacceptable.

Raping someone - acceptable as long as you've both got a few beers in you.

Jesus wept.

OMG so what you are saying is that all men are potential rapists, especially when exposed to alcohol, and that Dr Matt Taylor should face public execution?

Edit - Apologies I think I may have ignored the finer details and any sense of reasoning in order to create a shock angle on your point.

No, what he's saying is that ... that a man on TV should wear an appropriate shirt OR or he is in effect commiting a crime comparable with rape MULTIPLIED BY the DIFFERENCE between the remorseful man on TV and the unremorseful convicted celebrity rapist who's been punished by society and should be rehabilitated (unless we're saying the judicial system needs an overhaul in which case WTF cares about a shirt) DIVIDED by the number idiots who think Godwins law could never be repeated for anyone other than A-man Hizzle.

When we're done bending over and accepting the fist of righteousness, I actually think we'll be saying "THAT'S NOT YOUR WORD THAT'S OUR WORD, YOU CAN'T SAY THAT" for the words: man, britain, english, male and masculine - because they'll ave been utterly reappropriated by several conspiracies of ass-hats.

randomhandclaps

frankus said:

randomhandclaps said:

UnclePsychosis said:

Some really disturbing views on display here.

Giving a man a hard time for wearing an inappropriate shirt in a TV interview - unacceptable.

Raping someone - acceptable as long as you've both got a few beers in you.

Jesus wept.

OMG so what you are saying is that all men are potential rapists, especially when exposed to alcohol, and that Dr Matt Taylor should face public execution?

Edit - Apologies I think I may have ignored the finer details and any sense of reasoning in order to create a shock angle on your point.

No, what he's saying is that ... that a man on TV should wear an appropriate shirt OR or he is in effect commiting a crime comparable with rape MULTIPLIED BY the DIFFERENCE between the remorseful man on TV and the unremorseful convicted celebrity rapist who's been punished by society and should be rehabilitated (unless we're saying the judicial system needs an overhaul in which case WTF cares about a shirt) DIVIDED by the number idiots who think Godwins law could never be repeated for anyone other than A-man Hizzle.

When we're done bending over and accepting the fist of righteousness, I actually think we'll be saying "THAT'S NOT YOUR WORD THAT'S OUR WORD, YOU CAN'T SAY THAT" for the words: man, britain, english, male and masculine - because they'll ave been utterly reappropriated by several conspiracies of ass-hats.

I've just chalked all this out on a blackboard Frank and it's looks spot on to me.

digitalscream

frankus said:

When we're done bending over and accepting the fist of righteousness...

Man, I have to find a way to use that one in conversation. Soon.

Drew_TNBD

digitalscream said:

frankus said:

When we're done bending over and accepting the fist of righteousness...

Man, I have to find a way to use that one in conversation. Soon.

I don't think it's polite to just randomly (and righteously) fist someone during a conversation.

frankus

needs a bit more Feminist Mornington Cresent in the equation or you end up with a Singularity of Political Correctness rather akin to Big Brother's Doublethink but more of a hyperset of all possible culpabilities.

Imagine a student union peopled entirely by feminists who've worked together for long enough for their periods to align, and they were all out on the piss the night before and one of them was cheeked by someone from the rugby club and the rest had to support her even though they'd rather have gone to another club where the DJ is a sub-saharan hermafrodite merperson...

now times that by the biggest number you can think of and you're beginning to imagine how inhospitable a Political Correctness Singularity is. Seriously the center of a blackhole is beer and skittles by comparison.

digitalscream

Drew_fx said:

I don't think it's polite to just randomly (and righteously) fist someone during a conversation.

By definition, however, it would be right.

randomhandclaps

digitalscream said:

Drew_fx said:

I don't think it's polite to just randomly (and righteously) fist someone during a conversation.

By definition, however, it would be right.

The question then is simply WWJD?  Would Jesus do what's right or what's polite?  I think we all no the answer so next time the local priest gets all judgemental just remind him of what Jesus may have actually had to get up to in the name of what's right.