It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
racefaceec90
Frets: 1331
LOL 0
Wow! 0
Wisdom Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The Hydrasynth is probably the more powerful but the Minifreak has a VST.
Keep in mind they are both modern Wavetable Synths rather than retro analogue synths if you want the wonky synthwave stuff.
If 4 note polyphony is likely to be an issue, you might want something else though.
That said - if its a choice from the two you mentioned ... The Microfreak sound better IMO but the Hydranth is more varied, capable and probably easier to learn. In some way its interface - accessing one "section" at a time cold help the learning process.
While "technically" wavetable based... the HS isnt. Its only 7 waves per table not 64 as normal, and it has the standard static waveforms for traditional subtractive synthesis. If it were me - Id go hydranth from those two in your position.,
Very much looking forward to getting it and making sounds with it :-)
You'll still have to put the hours in and learn about synthesis but the controls are very well done. The "soft" encoders change, depending on whether you're adjusting an oscillator, envelope, lfo etc. and it's designed very well imo.
Another big plus is that it's become a hugely popular synth so there are lots of tutorials and patches available online.
I've also found that the criticisms of it's cold or digital sound are misplaced. It can sound as warm as the virtual analogs I've tried or owned. I guess the real synth heads might be able to tell it from an analog oberheim but it's close enough for me. Besides, all the extra waveforms open up loads of possibilities and my experience with NI Massive has shown that I like digital and wavetable sounds too.