It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
That is one piece of evidence to show body wood on a Stratocaster style guitar has little(not none)impact on amplified tone - id agree. but even with this one where there is little audible difference in most of the samples, some small differences are still observed
It does not show wood doesn't matter as stated - He could repeat the same experiments with other woods parts changed, other materials used for the body , or other styles of guitar construction if that is the conclusion he is trying to provide evidence for
For me, i find the neck makes more of a noticeable change, especially on Strat style guitars where body wood is often less important due to the trem and trem springs isolating the string vibrations from the body wood compared to a more directly mounted bridge
I'm currently building 3 near identical guitars so will try to remember to put my money where my mouth is when done. 2 archtops and one soldibody all with different neck woods, same body woods on the archtops, same scale, all with 2 humbuckers and similar wiring
Instagram
But now a curve ball - Why do Trussart Guitars work and sound so good - I'm not saying the Tele style nails the exact tone of a Tele, but it has its own tone that works - As it happens their LP style doesn't sound like an LP at all, but it does have its own tone that again has its place
An LP Custom definitely has more snap than a Standard, as does a 355 vs 335, and ebony-board SG vs regular. Maple Strats are def a shade snappier than the "plummier" rosewood board ones.
Body wood is less of a difference I think, but I'm sure it doesn't have zero effect.
It's likely that the wood characteristic (bright/snappy vs warm etc) falls on a normal distribution for that species, and that there's a fair amount of overlap of distributions between species, so possible to have a maple/ash guitar that sounds warmer and with more midrange than a brighter than average example of an alder/rosewood guitar.
Same for guitar construction and scale length, though I'd guess that construction makes the biggest difference with the least overlap, and there are tonal differences that could be easily misattributed to the wood that are actually due to the construction
wood,
snigger etc.
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
Not this discussion again. Can't wait for the bodyless guitar to be posted which sounds exactly like any other electric guitar.
You're welcome everyone.
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
I bought a £200 guitar from guitars in the attic in Mansfield.
I hadn't twigged the guitar shop is in the attic of a piano warehouse. I've never been so careful walking round a shop not to bump into stuff
£80,000 pianos scattered everywhere! Mixed with a smattering of £40,000 pianos!
One of my best decisions in my life was not taking my 3 year old loose cannon of a child that day!
https://sherwoodphoenix.co.uk/product-category/pianos/page/2/
I had a poke round their you tube channel. I absolutely cannot tell the difference between the sound of any of them.
The pianist who they have demoing them are incredible! I'm sure there are people arguing about the wood of the pianos changing the sound, but I'm going for the amount that lady has spent practicing being the defining point in her sound
see also: colour as opposed to colourway etc