replacement neck on a 335?

What's Hot
John_PJohn_P Frets: 2774
Just seen this 335 on  eBay   with a replacement neck after the original was damaged in a fire.

I'm not knowledge enough about old gibsons to know if the story is true but the body is in very good condition for it's age.   

Any thoughts?

0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
«1

Comments

  • matonematone Frets: 216
    Surely it would be dated from the label.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • SkippedSkipped Frets: 2371
    edited May 2016
    Authenticating a guitar body needs a real expert. Even for someone like Richard Henry it would surely be asking a lot. If that appraisal was inconclusive then the item is an expensive Orange Label.
    PAF pickups is pushing the story a step too far IMO. If the pickup maker mentioned has confidently identified them as real PAFs then the grab a bargain comment  is er.......nonsense.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • ESchapESchap Frets: 1428
    Serial number dates it to late 1961.  Horns look about right for that era.  However, it appears that everything else is replaced and its a recent refinish to my eyes.  I can't work out from his blurb if it it's the original PAF's got working by Shed, or if they are Shed standard pickups.    Could be a great guitar, but it really is a parts-a-Gibson.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • richardhomerrichardhomer Frets: 25006
    Highly unlikely that the body finish is original - black was never an 'official' option in this period.

    The bridge pick-up has a different shaped cover to the neck one (it's too rounded at the corners to be a real one from the period).

    Do we know if the serial number on the headstock is the same as the one on the orange label (which is visible through the bass side f hole)?

    It most probably is (at least broadly) as described.

    The difficulty is knowing what it's worth.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • John_PJohn_P Frets: 2774
    edited May 2016
    I asked the seller and he doesn't know who did the repair but he bought it from a collector/dealer called Heath - if that means anything to anyone.

    and apparently the finish looks much older close up with the finish sinking into the wood,  just looks better in the pics.

    It will be interesting to see if it sells - If it was local and I could check it out I might have been interested. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ESchapESchap Frets: 1428
    edited May 2016

    Serial numbers are the same but the picture of the orange label isn't clear enough to see if its a repro.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • richardhomerrichardhomer Frets: 25006
    John_P;1057985" said:
    apparently the finish looks much older close up with the finish sinking into the wood,  just looks better in the pics.
    Here are the official shipping totals:

    http://www.es-335.net/shipping.html

    No black ones are listed - though special order examples are known to exist (there's a picture of a '64 345 in black on the site).

    I expect this is a refinish - albeit perhaps an old one.

    It may well be a great player's guitar - but unlikely to sell for anything like 'collectors' money.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 74470
    I doubt anything on it is original except for the body itself. It's certainly a refinish I think - entirely understandable if it had been in a fire.

    At this point originality really doesn't matter at all, it's just a collection of parts which need to be assessed individually. Value is anyone's guess...

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • WezVWezV Frets: 17493
    The couple of shots inside the f-holes look remarkably clean .   need more info/closeups
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • underdogunderdog Frets: 8334
    With all that's been changed on it the value for me would be the same as a player grade 335 from the last decade or so.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Phil_aka_PipPhil_aka_Pip Frets: 9794
    underdog said:
    With all that's been changed on it the value for me would be the same as a player grade 335 from the last decade or so.
    ... so long as the guitar is of player grade. You'd need to play it to find out. If the seller is genuine, you could contact him saying you'd like to bid but you want to come round and play it first.
    "Working" software has only unobserved bugs. (Parroty Error: Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine!)
    Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • shugzshugz Frets: 775
    No affiliation with seller or guitar but I like that. It is what it is and if I'm reading the £1200 start as the lowest the seller would accept, it's not an awful deal is it?

    Or am I missing something? Doesn't look a Far Eastern fake albeit certainly not a collector's piece.

    Cheers
    Hugh

    www.proudhoney.com

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom
  • 312_JS312_JS Frets: 62
    If it is structurally sound, I'd buy that over any of the recent production.
    If I haven't bought my '62 already, I'd be all over it.
    '36 Black Special #4 | '56 LP Special | '62 Professional | '65 ES120T | '67 ES330TD | '12 ES330 VOS | '18 ES330 Satin
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DamianPDamianP Frets: 501
    edited May 2016
    If it had PAFs it would have to be very early '60s in which case the neck has the wrong headstock angle and the binding is far too thick. If it's an accurate replacement neck for the original then it is a late '60s guitar which wouldn't have had PAFs.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 74470
    It's quite likely that whoever replaced the neck deliberately reduced the headstock angle - it's actually even flatter than a 70s one - if the cause of needing it was a badly broken headstock, so I don't think you can draw any conclusions from that.

    I did when I repaired a '76 Thunderbird that needed a new section grafting in. I saw no point in repeating an original design fault when I had the opportunity to improve it.

    It may also have been rebound if it had fire damage - being plastic it's very likely to have melted. But I agree with WezV that what you can apparently see through the f-holes looks suspiciously clean for it to have been in a fire...

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DamianPDamianP Frets: 501
    ICBM said:
    It's quite likely that whoever replaced the neck deliberately reduced the headstock angle - it's actually even flatter than a 70s one - if the cause of needing it was a badly broken headstock, so I don't think you can draw any conclusions from that.

    I did when I repaired a '76 Thunderbird that needed a new section grafting in. I saw no point in repeating an original design fault when I had the opportunity to improve it.

    It may also have been rebound if it had fire damage - being plastic it's very likely to have melted. But I agree with WezV that what you can apparently see through the f-holes looks suspiciously clean for it to have been in a fire...

    More observations than conclusions. However the structural integrity of the neck might have been improved by changing the headstock angle, by doing so you've just de-valued the guitar significantly. I suppose someone might do that to an early '60s 335. Just not anyone I know who owns one. Whatever the story with the headstock, The the neck binding is inexcusable. I too struggle to imagine a fire so intense and localised that it rendered the neck irrepairable yet left the body undamaged.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • ESBlondeESBlonde Frets: 3646
    If Gibson renecked the guitar back in the day it would have been with a current version of the headstock/angle off the line. Only in recent decades has there been any attention paid by them to historical authenticity.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • meltedbuzzboxmeltedbuzzbox Frets: 10343
    DamianP;1060228" said:
    ICBM said:

    It's quite likely that whoever replaced the neck deliberately reduced the headstock angle - it's actually even flatter than a 70s one - if the cause of needing it was a badly broken headstock, so I don't think you can draw any conclusions from that.

    I did when I repaired a '76 Thunderbird that needed a new section grafting in. I saw no point in repeating an original design fault when I had the opportunity to improve it.

    It may also have been rebound if it had fire damage - being plastic it's very likely to have melted. But I agree with WezV that what you can apparently see through the f-holes looks suspiciously clean for it to have been in a fire...













    More observations than conclusions.



    However the structural integrity of the neck might have been improved by changing the headstock angle, by doing so you've just de-valued the guitar significantly. I suppose someone might do that to an early '60s 335. Just not anyone I know who owns one.



    Whatever the story with the headstock, The the neck binding is inexcusable.





    I too struggle to imagine a fire so intense and localised that it rendered the neck irrepairable yet left the body undamaged.
    It could have fallen out of a stand placed near an open fire and the neck could have landed in...

    Elaborate? Yes. Possible, yes.

    There is too much choice at 1200 quid to be nit picking over this possible (although unlikely) 60s body. Save your money and move on
    The Bigsby was the first successful design of what is now called a whammy bar or tremolo arm, although vibrato is the technically correct term for the musical effect it produces. In standard usage, tremolo is a rapid fluctuation of the volume of a note, while vibrato is a fluctuation in pitch. The origin of this nonstandard usage of the term by electric guitarists is attributed to Leo Fender, who also used the term “vibrato” to refer to what is really a tremolo effect.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • 312_JS312_JS Frets: 62
    Unlikely? I don't share your confusion..
    '36 Black Special #4 | '56 LP Special | '62 Professional | '65 ES120T | '67 ES330TD | '12 ES330 VOS | '18 ES330 Satin
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • John_PJohn_P Frets: 2774
    312_JS;1062804" said:
    Unlikely? I don't share your confusion..
    I'm curious what makes you certain about the body?

    I'm not knowledgeable enough about them to judge it so genuinely interested. If it was local I'd have been tempted to go and try it and see how it plays and looks close up.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.