It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
What about a disabled mother and child who do eject then?
As someone said above, a little bit of common sense is needed.
I’m so bored I might as well be listening to Pink Floyd
oh. It's not there. Maybe it's later.
Nope.
I’m so bored I might as well be listening to Pink Floyd
Don't like it? Simple, don't have kids.
Children are (mostly) a choice... disability is mostly not a choice...
So, in reasonable circumstances take kids out of pram, fold pram... then mum babies and disabled person all travel to their destination...
Disabled people have been discriminated against (either actively or by oversight) for years, hence the various legal protections against discrimination, and accommodations made by public or publically-licensed service providers.
It's not an ideal situation, but a buggy can be folded, some children are old enough to sit on laps etc, but a wheelchair user has fewer options
It is hard to see what a bus driver can do about it though if someone is set on not cooperating :-/
Not with my own children, of course - that would be wrong.
Also, unless I'm being incredibly stupid, a wheelchair bound person is in a wheelchair for a very good reason.
The only daftness I'm seeing here is Chalky's inability to understand what the issue is, more so when it's been pointed out reasonably several times.
Twisted Imaginings - A Horror And Gore Themed Blog http://bit.ly/2DF1NYi
In your first post you used the phrase "a freezing windswept night", when the incident took place in the morning. Now you're saying that anyone who disagrees with your position hates women with children. Why not stick to what's actually been said? You don't like it when people put words in your mouth (which was my point) but you do it to others with monotonous regularity.
Have you read the judgement?
He doesn't ever present any cogent argument, he merely takes an opposing position and never suggests solutions to what he claims is the problem, and when challenged he moves the goalposts.
He's a bewildered contrarian.
I’m so bored I might as well be listening to Pink Floyd
No, the moral of this story is "Don't go to Argos!"