It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
1W is the minimum since a shorting valve can pass up to about 1A before the amp's fuse blows, which produces 1W in a 1-ohm resistor obviously - so 2W is a good safety margin.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Whilst it is nice to have a resistor per OP valve there is not a lot of point unless there is provision to balance the cathode currents with dual bias pots. In any case such niceties are a bit wasted on guitar amps! As a rule the cathodes are commoned down one resistor, this also make the maths easier! One volt = one amp as IC says and so of course mV =mA.
If you want belts AND braces, stick a 1A diode across the resistor.
Dave.
That way if your valves aren't well matched then you can make sure that they aren't over dissipating as you can calculate
Using a common resistor for all the valves then you don't know what each valve is dissipating and say if one valve is not conducting at all you may end up biasing the working valve/s very hot.
I've seen this in several amps, including one version of the SVT.
Here's a common way to do it with external bias points (note sockets wired for EL34s).
Rift Amplification
Brackley, Northamptonshire
www.riftamps.co.uk
Yes, I agree, nice to do and the 'right way' to do it!
However, the average Joe is not going to have a rake of OP valves to try so even if the valves are a bit mismatched there is little he can do about it (could fit a bias balance pot* of course) . Ignorance is bliss?
The consequences of mismatched valves will be an increase in remnant hum and (totally inaudible for guitar!) a bit more even harmonic distortion. Of course , a SERIOUSLY out of specc' valve will hum badly.
Large production runs will use batches of valves which 'should' be fairly consistent and a bad imbalance should fail a S/N test.
There is a bit of a paradox here. Cathode biased guitar amps almost never have individual Rs and caps whilst Hi Fi amps almost always do. Most valve data sheets also require separate cathode resistors. If we wanted to have equal currents in the valves, 'we' would fit two resistors but nobody, AFAIK ever does!
*Bs of course fit a balance pot on most of their range. Never seen a real need? The OP stage balance is set with a special meter that reads low frequencies but Mk 1 lug close to the speaker works just as well!
Dave.
One reason it may not be is that it doesn't 'sound right' if you want a typical cathode-bias sound. It sounds more like fixed-bias in some ways, which is apparently why Cornell used it on his mini Plexi.
I first came across this a long time ago when a friend had an AC30 which a hi-fi tech had 'improved' by fitting separate cathode resistors, caps and trimmers for each valve, so they could all be biased perfectly. It sounded somehow flat and lifeless, and not like an AC30 - so as a quick test I replaced the beautifully-made little circuit board with a single resistor and cap... instant great AC30 tone.
Separate bias-metering resistors are the best method though, as jpfamps said - with a single one you don't know if one valve is drawing too much (or all) the current.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
"Separate bias-metering resistors are the best method though, as jpfamps said - with a single one you don't know if one valve is drawing too much (or all) the current. "
Well, you would IC coz it would hum like a cnut! N very B I am not saying that separate sense Rs are a bad thing at all, just a bit OTT for guitar amps.
Dave.
Suppose you have a four-valve amp, with a common bias sense resistor for both valves on each side and a bias trimmer for each side. If one valve is not working you will end up biasing the other one on the same side to double the correct current, and there will be no hum.
This is not a theoretical example, it's a Marshall DSL/TSL100…
OK, with a two-valve amp or a four-valve one with a single resistor then it would still hum.
But separate resistors are always better and there is no downside, other than very marginal cost - they will also allow you to easily spot a badly-matched valve set, which is quite common even if they're supposedly matched.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
I bow to your practical experience IC but, "Bias trimmer per side" How many 4xEL34 (say) 100W amps have those?
Of course, IF you have the ability to balance the bias voltages then yes, of course you must have individual sense resistors but I i say again, how many (old) PA and guitar amps had the facility to balance the valves?
I agree that the cost of the extra sense Rs is minimal (but NOT trivial! see in a minute) but then you really have to have two bias pots (or do it 'our' way) . I have said this many, many times in Frets, Guitar amps is a VERY competitive game! I would guess adding another 2W 1R plus preset (and don't forget the PCB has to be designed for it!) would add about $1 per chassis and a $ in production means $10 in the shop and THAT can put you into another price range, i.e. the wrong side of a grand!
In any event, in these days of super accurate DMMs you can get a very good idea of relative cathode current by careful inspection of Vg2 a technique I used to determine the 'odd' valve in A30s when they seemed a bit hummy.
I WILL admit to being a bit anal about amp hum! A relic I guess of my Hi Fi history.
Dave.
BTW. I will agree about 'supposed to be matched'. I went through about ten sets of pairs and quartets of EL84s and EL34s and found many were further out of their 'group' than others that were not in it (iyswim!)
I see no solution to this problem for the cash strapped player? Back in the day, this is the sort of thing the magazines would take on? Buying in a selection of so called 'matched sets' and then getting them professionally tested.
Nowadays mags do not have the money, staff or time and are scared witless of losing advertising.
Dave.
The reason Fender moved to bias-balance rather than bias-adjustment in the late 60s is because they could then buy ungraded valves in bulk knowing that they were all close to the design spec so the overall bias would be about right, and get a perfect hum-free balance with any set. Nowadays bias adjustment is more useful because the valves vary so wildly.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
I concur with ICBM.
I like to have a single bias adjust, but have the ability to measure the cathode current through each valve.
That way you can be sure that none of your valves are over dissipating and all are drawing current.
If your valves are so badly matched that they can't be biased satisfactorily with a single adjustment then they probably shouldn't be used.
A common problem when valves short is that the screen grid resistors go open circuit, so any new valves installed in that position will not conduct. In a 4 (or even 6) valve output stage with single current sense resistors you would end up biasing a remaining valves too hot.
I have actually seen this in several amps, including some versions of the SVT and T/TSL100s where the user has changed that valves and followed the biasing procedure in the manual.
I've also seen this in HRDs with a single bias test point. You would be surprised how little hum there is in these amps with only one valve conducting.
The DSL biasing system is not ideal because adjusting the bias for one valve affects the bias on the other side!
I would have preferred a single adjustment and 2 test points.
Having said that the bias supply not the worst problem with the DSL.....
I can tell when I am in a hole so I shall stop digging!
I guess the reason I mentioned increased hum was because I had to check it against a specification. I have no idea what the S/N spec would be for the other makes mentioned!
Maybe older guitar amps did not have bias pots but decent valve PA amps did. In fact the Wimbledon (2X KT66) had a METER on the front that allowed you to measure and check Vss, Va and anode current. Oddly perhaps THE most famous KT66 amplifier, the Quad ll had but a single cathode resistor, but I am bloody sure Peter Walker knew what he was doing!
Dave.
"The DSL biasing system is not ideal because adjusting the bias for one valve affects the bias on the other side!"
Oh! I wonder why they did not use the earthed wiper system where you get a differential bias adjustment? There is a little bit of interaction but not a lot.
Dave.
Just one of the many design faults in these amps by someone who clearly didn't know much about valve amp failures.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein