It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I just get tetchy with people mwhoncry of selling out and decline in quality the instant a band starts selling decent numbers of records.
Its like religion - I have no problem with anyone believing/liking whatever they want, as long as they don’t tell me what to think
i wasn't beating Graham up too badly, i don't think. even if my tone was irreverent (or provocative) about blur in general. Graham's perfectly ok by me, as a musician and what i know of him as a person from what i have read.
i also said that he was my favourite member of blur and that i warmed to him most in interviews (for the record, the one that got really on my tits was that smirking cheese dude).
i also like bits of his stuff before and after the britpop-fuss-over-nothing that i felt held him back creatively. if that's an outrageous heresy to his fans, i can live with that. i feel the same way about musicians i like and will defend them. different strokes etc.
if the 'guardian style bullshit regurgitation' was too much for some, that's ok too. i'v never read a blur guardian review to regurgitate, but hey ho. you're entitled to your opinion.
re any lingering suspicion of my 'arty' pretentions, it is worth bearing in mind that Graham is a fine arts graduate. me too. so that raises my expectations of him as a performer-artist-whatever, above 'craft for craft's sake', to a different register (art school concerns, if you like);
breaking new ground, challenging expectations, 'what if?'. and that goes hand-in-hand with resisting formula (or subverting it) and not prioritising 'wanting to be popular' as a motivation to do things above 'trying to do something interesting'.
you don't have to be an arts graduate to do that, some people just have it in their natures (Jimi one among many), but engagement with graduate level fine art study is speciafically designed to draw that insight/attitude/sensitivity out of a person and fine train it, like a muscle, so the student can can later bring it to bear on any task. that's why so many interesting bands have fine art guitarists (the beatles? the who? and many more since. mcgeoch is my favourite, choose yours).
in view of those specific expectations, my personal impression is that Graham under-achieved according to his potential (a compliment in there) during blur's britpop phase (heresy?).
i am not saying he didn't make some great records during that period, i even bought a couple of singles (never an album). but he was possibly easily distracted by shiny objects at that time, for whatever reason, and things like 'parklife' and 'country house' grate, frankly. silly songs.
i liked suede more, and c1992-1994 bought both albums and most of their singles to get the extra tracks, which were usually better than the main track. they later released all those extra bits on a compo double CD later (sci-fi) and that's the great forgotten suede album.
when you hear the first CD of the that (bernard era) and think that is stuff they considered 'extra tracks' (not even album or single appropriate), you really begin to get a sense of how much bernard had to give, and what a shame it was that things fell apart during album 2.
there are some shit suede songs and some mighty blur songs, but generally i felt bernard was trying harder around that time. accordingly bernard got poster space on my bedroom wall and blur didn't. sorry Graham!