It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
One test is whether the drummer stops when the guitarist plays a power chord.
Depends if it's the high-end Naim kit...
They're fun, and sound more 'Naim' the more you spend, but they don't sound anything like real instruments.
Kans are a prime example, as are Isobariks.
Yes, they play 'tunes', but they do not and have never reproduced music.
They are more of a cult, a religion than a means of accurately reproducing sound.
I feared i'd be met with the usual (and partly justified, see "audiophiles") negativity honestly, so went a bit passive/aggressive when TheMarlin posted asking what i meant exactly.
Due apologies @TheMarlin as it appears you simply misunderstood the OP
This is rather encouraging actually, let's hope more chip in.
As mentioned elsewhere i'm a bit of a caveman, so no smart phones, 8k digital cameras and the like am afraid.
But in the interest of contributing, my systems are currently:
The living room. See: when she's not in the house. Also see: why my dog lives outside.
- Micro Seiki SX-8000 (sliiightly modified by me).
- Airtangent 2002 tonearm.
- Van Den Hul Grasshoper GLA MKiii cartridge.
- B&W Nautilus speakers (back in the good ole days when British meant BRITISH).
- Driven by a measly four, yes, four, Krell FPB 750MCXs. Modified by me..
- Power distribution, cables and connectors a mix of Furutech and Oyaide.
- Feet and rack system by Finite elemente.
The desktop. Used while i melt my eyes in front of a screen like the modern day monkey they want us all to be; or become..
- DAC built by me -as most things are in both lists-, but loosely focused on Stax's exceptional DAC-X1T. Why loosely thee ask? Because unlike Stax, money and volume weren't an object; thus, it now has its own external power supply and its main unit rather extensively modified; towards the better that is. I pray to God it doesn't ever malfunction, as certain components are no longer being made and they cost so much back then, i just couldn't afford to buy doubles (modules alone were insane). To service this should the need arise, i'd need literally redesign parts of its main unit, so as to accommodate me in finding replacements.
- SRX Plus further upgraded and built by yours truly (that's an electrostatic amplifier)
- STAX SR-009s headphones. Could not afford the original Omegas back in the 90s, so.. second best.
- Power distribution, cables and connectors are all Furutech.
- Feet and rack system all from Finite Elemente (Pagodas in both rooms, but the old models, before they went greed-happy and the professor left them)
Probably forgot an item or two, my apologies if so.
And yes, i know; i do.
But, lol.. I paid for it fair and square. And it's been a lifetime's work. Plus, am in the business.
Is it worth it? Ooh yeah. It really is.
* As to Naim, he's not wrong really. Ideally, you'd only recommend so as to balance a system heavily leaning towards brightness to name the most ovious, though other criteria also apply to this. Still an exceptional company however.
I bought my first decent system from a 'Flat Earth' Linn/Naim dealership and chose Rega, Creek and Royd.
I found the Linn/Naim sound unnatural and haven't changed my opinion since.
Every piece of equipment I buy is subjected to a blind test, rather than blind acceptance .
However, almost everything is.. The point is where/how and whether it can thus be utilised in a system over-compensating in some areas, but lacking in others. AKA, your HiFi 101 until you've spent a kidney, a liver and a couple of offspring you thought best to sell in the dark web. After all, you could always make more! Right..?
So very roughly put;
You end up with 'a' system, got your source(s), amplification/drive, your monitors/drivers, plus the bulk of its cabling (yes, signal degrades, so yes, it matters), plus whatever you've done or neglected to in terms of the mechanical; be it by absorbing or transferring vibrations.
The lot combined produces 'a' sound, which by very definition will not be the real thing, ever. Always an approximation, you playing with the percentages. How close to what the real thing 'would be' (it being where the subjective creeps in, albeit it gets worse).
Said sound might be, again to keep it plain, say leaning towards bright, or dark. It might say have the appearance of balance, only it sounds boxed in, or artificial. It might sound airy, but lacking flow or attack. And the list goes on.
So.. you compensate. You isolate the unit/component most responsible for said.. "deviation" from what you (subjective) think is ideal, and replace it with another unit that will balance the whole, or more realistically, bring it a bit closer to how the real thing 'would be'.
(presuming you [figuratively speaking] have even the slightest of what that is, but let us skip this part, lol)
Now to your implied question, Naim does have a 'signature' sound. Most companies tend to build in that way, so as to sonically stand out/differentiate themselves. They also happen to be very good in some areas, so so in others and so on.
You can have systems where something Naim will shine, you can have systems where it will impede.
They do however (or rather, used to, i don't follow their new and all-digital lineup) offer very good products and they do have their place.
They were also smart enough to go for a combination of attributes that even back then were gaining prominence among the HiFi crowd (sadly, but..); so naturally, as time went by, they developed a fanbase. You need not be in it, am not either.
just doesn't mean they're bad
Thousands of folks thinking they're "listening" could only wish for a couple of Naim units in their systems. To keep it realistic this last bit..
I have listened to music through a hi-fi system, many different ones it has to be said, for around fifty years. I have had turntables, cassette decks, tuners and CD players. I now have a CD player with a digital input [and analogue volume control]. The digital input receives a signal from a Sonos system which plays FLAC files stored on my computer.
Details of my system:
Resolution Audio Opus CD player
A pair of Classe CA M350 monoblocks
B&W 803D speakers
All silver wired balanced interconnects, speaker cables, mains cables.
A self built mains distribution block
A dedicated mains spur/one socket ring combo for the hi-fi system.
My system is old but it works very well as it majors on the music on disk rather than startling detail such as soundstage depth or width etc. I get immersed in the music which varies from Chopin to AC/DC with folk, blues, country and country rock getting most plays. I have about 1800 CDs with about a third of these Classical.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
And deserving its own mention unfortunately, see musical trends and the decline of it all. All digital, all compressed, all algorithm guesswork rather than reproducing with fidelity, etc. etc.
(with some knowldge of course, one can always upgrade older equipment, as technological advances can occasionally be of help if used wisely, but that is an asterisk for the few)
With one exception; speakers.
Speakers.. are probably the one and only element that evolves; as in literally, they have evolved and continue to do so. And it is an evolution most evident sonically. For those with deep pockets, granted, but evolving they are.
* Personally speaking however, am also "done". Enough
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
Until of course one factors in profit and greed, lol, at which point.. it all makes sense again.
(your useless information of the day, this is all starts with Philips and their accursed 'new' at the time format and way of 'storing' information)
As to the Seiki, whatever objectivity my profession may call for, eye of the beholder in all things. There's certainly better out there*, but not for me, i run out of offspring to sell.
* see here: https://techdas.jp/pages/air-force-iii-premium/
** by total, total coincidence, same brain behind both companies. And, continuing with the uncanny coincidences of course, Japanese.
@scrumhalf definitely and by a mile. The shelves full (and commonly perused) first and foremost ^^
I’m spending a small fortune on stuff to play on it though, mostly vinyl. Fortunately, I’d kept a couple of hundred LPs and even more CDs rather than sell everything years ago. I do lament the stuff I did sell though.