It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
If "they" want to come round for a cuppa, I'll quite happily tell "them" what I've been up to. Would be nice to have some company.
https://forensicresources.org/2019/are-there-really-flaws-in-cell-phone-location-evidence/
https://www.envistaforensics.com/knowledge-center/insights/articles/the-role-of-cell-phone-location-mapping-in-criminal-cases/
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/police-crime-sentencing-and-courts-bill-2021-draft-guidance/extraction-of-information-from-electronic-devices-draft-code-of-practice-accessible-version
If someone puts your phone (or any other belonging really) at the scene of a crime it doesn't really matter if it's recording sounds though?
If someone wants to frame you there's lots of things they could do.
It's not proof though and you probably wouldn't be convincted on that alone.
In this instance, my gut is that there is a bit of confirmation bias at play. You are probably a person whose profile online puts you in a pot which means that you would get that news article in your "feed". You may have seen it before, you may not have. You may or may not have received it before, but you notice it this time because you watched the film.
The other possible scenario is that your phone noticed that a certain song or soundtrack was playing (loads of phones do this by default even when locked, they'll tell you what that song is so you don't even have to Shazam it anymore). You could check for this by looking at Settings and searching "Now Playing" history. Honestly I don't know if Google uses the data collected in this way, but I assume that they do.
Wasn't paying much attention to the story though.