It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
The uberschall twin jet is basically sex in an amp. But better. And with more gain.
There is something about a jcm800 though.
I'm still keen to buy a 50watt plexi. However I just bought a modern Vox AC30 C2. This was actually for 2 reasons. The first was I'd borrowed one and they take pedals very well. The second was I'd noticed at gigs that some sound engineers would get really arsey about a big amp on stage and start turning you down before you d even played a note ( The tsl60 is the quietest head ever IMHO). So a lot of it is psychology for people.
Early 1998-2001 TSL 100s are to be avoided though. They do have a fault on the PCB that can make them go bang. This was a bitter wallet raping experience I can tell you.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Rather like Les Pauls, I recognise Marshall amps are a staple of many classic guitar sounds; there are plenty of players I like who make them sound good - unfortunately I'm not one of them!
I have tried a number of Marshalls over the years I have never been able to make one work for me.
I find the cleans 'stiff' (lacking the dynamic 'give' under the fingers which more Fender-like amps seem to have) and the drive sounds too harsh and cutting.
It really is a matter of tonal preferences - they 'mesh' with Les Pauls particularly well. If they 'do' what you want, they're great. They 'do' just about everything I don't want from an amp.
You do need one, and may I recommend this little bargain as a good place to start?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Marshall-Limited-Edition-Amp-1997-/171366004476?pt=UK_MusicalInstr_Amplifiers_RL&hash=item27e635b6fc
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
This is so indicative of the generation gap. To old farts like me Marshalls are deep-voiced, thunderous amps which can knock you to the floor with a chest punch, but a few short years into the master volume era they became silly fizz-boxes in comparison. I still love some of their reissues but they actually don't make a proper production line amp anymore. At least modern Fender amps attempt to incorporate modern features alongside classic own-brand tones, instead of completely replacing them. What modern Marshall has a channel which really sounds and behaves like a Superlead, other than the reissues? None that I've heard anyway.