It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
They could clear up with so many of their classic designs just reimagined and repackaged with more flexibility.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; a power scaled plexi on channel one, and an 800 on channel two. So many other manufacturers have done something similar, so I don't see why Marshall seem to be content with pedalling crap like the JVM and Code. How old is the JVM now?? And you can tell it's a ageing product as there as special editions, the horrible "tattoo" variants, "carbon fibre" rubbish and "dark" variants. You don't see many other manufacturers stooping so low to try to reenergise a line. It's almost like they've forgotten what made them good in the first place, and they've forgotten what "cool" is. It wasn't an Astoria, Code, or special edition JVM. For God's sake, just make an amp that isn't gimmicky, plasticky, and generally naff!
A huge amount of people still aspire to have the Marshall brand in their backline, but aside from the usual classic amps in the reissue line (which must make up the majority of their sales) there is literally ZERO in their "current" range that makes anybody what to buy one.
They have some good ideas occasionally and actually the YJM was a good amp but the packaging was rubbish and it had to bear the Malmsteen signature for some reason.
Why did that need to be a signature amp? Why did the headshell need to be so large and why did it need a pre-determined OD and noise gate built into it? Ditch the shit branding, and the cheesy ideas already.
They miss the mark so often that you have to wonder what the hell is going on.
The AFD; Slash barely uses them anymore, and again they were gimmicky. A facsimile of the amp that Slash actually recorded with. They sounded average and seemed to appeal to bedroom teenagers rather than actual touring guitarists.
It beggars belief.
At home its loud, very responsive eq that makes it hard to dial in a tone quickly but offers a lot of scope to deal with different guitars, all the tone knobs seem to do more than on my old DSL, TSL and 800 marshalls, which is nice.
I think I'll be running it rhythm clipped for a dirty/dirtier setup with a clean boost in the loop and a TS in front.
PA Hire and Event Management
If only it was about 1/3rd price new. And that I could trust Marshall as a brand... As it is, it's a massively overpriced amp with a very niche market. A 1 watt jtm priced lower (far east built?) and built well would sell like hot cakes!
Add to that what you have suggested (power scaled vintage plexi/modern JCM two channel amp) and you've pretty much cornered the whole market for Marshall amps - a great practice amp that's brilliant at one thing (practice!) and a great two channel do it all amp that sounds pretty much identical to the old ones we know and love.
Every other manufacturer can do it... Even fender have the bassbreaker series, which seem to fit the bill.
PA Hire and Event Management
I have a 100-watt Jubilee head and it's brilliant for home use - it sounds great at very low volumes.
PA Hire and Event Management