It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
http://www.seymourduncan.com/pickup/duality-bridge
http://www.seymourduncan.com/pickup/duality-neck
Guitars sound great but what is with the weird phasing on the cymbals? Cleans seem really nice.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
The RA2 set sounds great on paper.
http://www.emgpickups.com/guitar/single-coil/strat/ra-2.html
http://www.emgpickups.com/guitar/single-coil/strat/ra-5.html
They're not designed to be PAFs with a battery (that'd be kind of pointless), they're actives inspired by PAFs. Actives tend to have a different response to passives and I guess this is another attempt at a middle ground, but more towards the passive side (the previous 57/66 set still sounds fairly similar to a typical EMG IMO).
At least in terms of output it'd be fair to say there's not a lot coming from the preamp, which is a big departure for EMG (their standard pickups are very low output which is then boosted by the preamp). It's not clear what the preamp is doing in terms of EQ. I wonder if it'd be possible to deconstruct them and find out. My guess is there's an amount of filtering and EQ being applied similar to my understanding of how the Duncan Blackout modular preamp works.
Not seen any UK/EU dealer having stock of the EMG Retroactives yet, Thomann says 20th March
What does the preamp add to the product in this case in terms of tone shaping which makes it worth the hassle of batteries?
If they've got the even low end response of EMG actives but the upper mid cut of passives then that'd be great, but it's hard to tell from YouTube demos.
Batteries tend to last a long time with EMGs so it really isn't that big of a deal, I got a year out of my two main guitars before I noticed them sounding weaker and they get played a lot.
Lasse Lammert has done a short clip comparing the 57 (note this is not a Retroactive) to the 77 Retroactive
I dare say that this new line will satisfy guitarists who listen with their eyes.
So far I've tended to prefer EMGs oldschool single mode offerings - 81/85/60, J, SA etc. I've had the polepiece stuff like Het Set, still have 57/66 set, and SLV. And while they're all cool, I kind of just end up going back to their standard stuff.
Got to say so far I'm not really feeling the 77 set in the clip posted above. Still interested in the 55 but also recently discovered the Fishman KSE set, which seem pretty great on paper save for the crap battery life in comparison to EMG. 3 modes - tight active tone, passive humbucker, and single coil. Would go a long way in a single guitar.
https://www.fishman.com/products/series/fluence/killswitch-engage-signature-pickup-set/
I keep trying other stuff and keep coming back to actives, they're just better controlled for the tuning and style I play.
I don't think many people will have compared the Retroactives to Fluences, there aren't many reviews of RA anywhere. But it seems a lot of long time EMG players seem to have jumped over to Fishman in the past couple of years. Devin Townsend, both guys from Killswitch Engage, and Stephen Carpenter all seem to have signature sets at Fishman, all of those guys had been EMG users for a long long time.
I'm not sure how much of that is going to be money related, since EMG seem pretty reluctant to do signature deals, but when I saw Devin Townsend earlier this year his tone was pretty awesome.
The only thing that puts me off the Fishmans is battery life, dependent on set, isn't much more than around 100 hours. Typical EMGs easily get 10x that. They do a rechargable battery pack you charge through the control cavity cover but it's something like £100+ depending on the option.