It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
"The Witcher" will likely include Witcher III which can be a beast to drive graphically if you want to have it look as awesome as it deserves
For £2000 You can make a VERY nice home computer and have a simple laptop to work/browse on the go.. or have a quite good gaming laptop. The cousin's use case will be very important here - if they plan to play games on the go (including Witcher) then don't even consider a home computer as every penny should be spent towards a laptop... if they want a laptop for school/work/travel but will mostly be gaming at home then a £500 laptop and £1500 desktop computer might be a better way to go.
Definitely find out what sort of thing they're after/need before accurate advice can be given
For gaming Ryzen isn't better or cheaper*, so don't wait any longer than needed
*For gaming (and really only gaming) an Intel i7 7700K (£360) is faster in many games (and those it's not faster than, it is very closely second) than the AMD 1800X (£499) due to games not fully utilising more than 2-4 cores (i7's have 8 logical cores, so even where games DO use 4 whole cores it's not maxed out) and the i7 having a higher clock speed. This is the case for a number of games... if you go for price parity the 1700X (£370) then the AMD lags behind slightly.
AMD cleverly tried to market the 1800X against the 6950X (£1000!) as being 50% the price but better for gaming, but for gaming the 7700K is already faster in most cases than the 6950 so Intel make a chip that costs 35% of the 6950X and is better for gaming. Which I think was a mistake... they caught up to Intel - which is amazing considering where they were, so market it as an alternative for similar gaming performance, similar pricing and better productivity (for non-gaming things, the AMD has the clear advantage of higher core count than an i7 7700K, so will be much better for many CPU intensive tasks...) rather than trying to compare apples to oranges when the competition also sell perfectly good apples...
If the AMD offering were cheaper OR faster (ideally both) then waiting makes lots of sense... as it is, there's little reason to wait**
** AMD does manage the similar performance on lower wattage, so if the Laptop is definitely the way to go, then perhaps there's an argument for waiting, as battery life will be better by a noticeable margin (though the GPU will be using much more watts than the CPU so it's not going to be a quarter better or a third better... but it will still be a good improvement over the intel part - for, as mentioned above about the same price-per-frame)
But with a £2000 budget you can aim for a reasonable laptop
Taking the 256 SSD on board, it's counting out the MSI stuff under £2K, but people are saying that it's smoother than the Razer...
They're expensive and bloody portable. And student halls get burgled. I wasn't burgled, but my flatmate was, and it was the laptop and ipod they grabbed.
Gaming laptops are generally portable enough to be stolen, but the ones that are actually nice to play on are heavy - as in, heavy enough to not want to carry everywhere. When I bought a shite, cheap netbook, it accompanied me everywhere. It was small and light enough that I could easily sling it into a bag. Cheap enough that I didn't care too much about putting it into a padded laptop bag. All you need is a couple of 1tb external hard drives and a kid who's smart enough to regularly backup to both
So, for uni, I'd probably say a chromebook or a small laptop of some kind that prioritises basic web and office applications and portability over performance. I LOVED my shitty, early, crashy windows 7 notebook thing and only had it for the last year of uni. My quite-powerful gaming laptop stayed at home... And didn't get used for gaming as much as my xbox because it wasn't as nice to use.
So, with that in mind, I'd probably lean towards a half decent 24"-30" IPS monitor and gaming monitors that don't need mad 144hz refresh rates are not stupidly expensive - that should be under £200 for a decent quality screen. Then get a desktop for the gaming. It'll give them a more powerful computer that's more responsive for working in dorms, FAR better for games, *less* likely to be stolen unless someone is really dedicated (because it's a big heavy tower with cables coming out of it everywhere, including the power cable, monitor cable and an external drive versus a little laptop you can nip in and grab).
https://www.chillblast.com/chillblast-fusion-krypton-2-gaming-pc.html?category_id=412#product-details-tab-tab298
That ^^ looks incredible. You could probably put a bigger m.2 SSD in and keep the monitor, computer AND notebook within a £2k budget. Probably.
Of course, you'll need a desk and space for a desktop so it might all be moot
Does this seem like a good recommendation? Sounds like it beats the Razer Blade and the Blade Stealth with Core, as well as the MSI GS36VR.
Performance wise it's great. I'm not a gamer but as an engineer and a side hobby of photography, i need the graphics power to run CAD software and Adobe Lightroom/Photoshop. Also need the computing power to do programming. Laptop never really gave me problems on those fronts, and can handle running CAD duplicated on a TV. Perhaps not the most intensive usage of the laptop's capabilities, but i'm confident it will run higher loads perfectly fine.
Aside from screen and performance etc, i think keyboard, trackpad, wifi module, and other small things are important considerations. Razer has great build quality and i feel that the small details are worth the premium.
Oh yea, i use the 1080 non-touchscreen version because it's cheaper and supposedly has better colour accuracy than the touchscreen version. I came from using a 3K screen (HP x360 Spectre) and haven't missed the higher resolution. To me, not much of a difference in resolution, but a big difference in colour representation.
The fan outlets are on the underside of the laptop though. For this reason, there are two long and thick rubber strips running the length of the laptop on the bottom to prop the laptop up. However, when i'm at home, i prop it up further with laptop cooling balls or whatever they're called. Not sure if it really helps much, but just gives me a peace of mind.
Easily enough for OS, apps and documents. I actually keep my word documents on it for no reason other than they're tiny - probably bad management on my part, but it's fast! I keep my games (all two of them!) on the hdd.
And it's less nickable - our flat was burgled in the first year despite automatic locks on the doors (some housemates were regularly locked out) and my shed in the second or third year (also locked) was smashed open for a bike. Students make for a common target, even if it is still very unlucky to be targeted. A desktop is just far less likely to be stolen because it's a pain in the arse.
Obviously laptops are more portable now, but I really wouldn't want to carry around something so expensive where it could be accidentally left on a bus (it does happen), dropped or stolen. A small netbook type jobby is super cheap, longer battery life and way more portable while allowing productivity. Back up the documents to Google drive for instant backup and access on the more powerful computer back home.
All imo and such. There is the logistical challenge of where it goes and how to get it there, of course. But it's definitely worthy of consideration.
But you do have think hard about what you need.
I built a PC 3 years go (i7 4770S) but cheapes out on the Motherboard which doesn't have enough USB slots so have to have extenders/Hubs.