Its easy to justify having a Strat, and a Les Paul, and a Telecaster, and an acoustic, and a nylon, and a 12 string, and a bass guitar, and a resonator, etc etc...
Because each one is different.
Some of my guitars however, do very similar things in terms of sound / tone (and even to look at).
I feel this burning need to thin the herd, but if someone can please give me a valid and logical reason to keep multiple guitars that are very similar, that would really give me some peace of mind :-)
...and also keep me away from the classifieds section here (at least a little bit).
Comments
I have never really understood people who have a lot of the same model without any difference in pickup types, but if it makes them happy, who am I to judge?
Tried that - AlNiCo 4 in the Axcess
BareKnuckle Mules (AlNiCo IV) in the Relic
AlNiCo 2 in the Burny
Honestly...? Still sound very similar...
Here are the four amigos:
[Imgur](https://i.imgur.com/XONMRJs.jpg)
(Doesn’t mean I won’t buy more in future though.)
I think that if you have 2 Strats, then chances are you'll prefer A to B - On that basis A gets all the work and B is redundant so less of a reason to buy it - But a Strat and a Tele etc etc and you have different tools as required - The down side to this is that you might hate say any Gibson and only prefer say a Strat, so why not have a multiple selection of Strats
Yet a large part of me say's it will be great if I could get far closer to mastering one guitar
You, Sir, are a genius.
For Christmas Mrs9000 bought me a mug which says ‘You can never have too many guitars’. For a while I saw this as a green light.