It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
A bitsa / partscaster is a bitsa / partscaster, whoever makes it.
he does way more than screw necks to bodies, from what I’ve seen. All the difference in the world..
build is when you’ve fabricated a part of the guitar yourself.
He makes high quality parts - so he would be more logically comparable to Warmoth or Musikraft, rather that a person / company who screws parts together.
I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong here...
The only problem is they charge extra for pretty much everything - including what should be basic things like deepening the pickup routs (to take modern pickups) or doing a HSH or universal pickup rout - or routing for a different bridge.
All these are basic (no extra cost) at Warmoth.
I'm not taking away the quality - its just they aren't any different to me building one. I've been a guitar tech for years - professionally set up literally tens of thousands of instruments - but I don't call it anything other than a bitsa.
they seem like a great place to get your parts but having to go the custom build route for a single / Humbucker for instance is a bit strange specially when they rout both pickups as standard on other offerings..
But ultimately the classification is unimportant. If you take the logic back far enough every guitar, in fact every thing, is the sum of its constituent parts, and definitions are notoriously subjective.
The OP was really generated from a comment I remember somebody making about Partscasters mainly being successful due to a good setup, and that lots get parted back out before being given half a chance.
Having just gone through that process myself I wondered how common it was.
The other thing I have found it that having had an idea of what the finished guitar would be - a bluesy, chimey, jazzy type of Tele - it turned out to be something completely different - a powerful, cutting rock machine. Getting my head around that has taken some time but now I'm there I really like it.
For me, it's become more about the relaxation, challenge and satisfaction of *creating* something as much as it is about creating a shape or configuration that I really - really - want and wouldn't be able to buy off the shelf.
And I'm certainly long past the stage of needing any more guitars.
I started out building a few, just to check that I could actually build them (and still have a couple kicking around from those days). Then got tempted by GSP's stuff, and concentrated on assembly & finishing for a while, but have gone back to starting with raw timber more recently.
This lot were done in Q1 this year ...
This one finished a few months ago
This one too
(I'm quite chuffed with the back view for some reason )
This was a fun thing to put together
Its twin came with an unexpected challenge, but was sorted quite nicely ...
I had a nice piece of walnut that needed a guitar making for it ...
(And loads more).
How do they play? I've got some branded guitars that play better, and some that don't play so well.
With my own builds, I'm far happier tweaking them to get them to play more nicely, than I would be with one of the PRSs or some other branded guitar, where one little slip of the screwdriver, and there's £500 of value gone! If I can't get something to play nicely, then it generally just gets recycled into another build. So I'm never stuck with something that I can't get rid of!
The quality of a partscaster will be a combination of the quality of the components and the skill of the people assembling the guitar - when I get Feline to do it, I end up with something quite lovely, but if I break out the soldering iron myself... I end up with a sad pile of charred wood. Most of my favourite recent acquisitions have been made from @GSPBASSES parts, and I love the way they feel in the hand. But it's something quite distinct, and I can imagine someone hating it and preferring a "proper" Fender* - that's where the taste comes into it.
My strat is actually various components from different sources - high end Fender Mexico body, standard Mex neck, Wilkinson bridge, Joseph Kaye / Sonic Monkey pickups - originally put together by me but then worked on by Tom at Feline, which brought it up to a much higher level. On the other hand my first partscaster is an unattributable body (ironically called the blingcaster for its rough gold spray-job) currently with a Fernandes neck and Alegree pickups, and I enjoy playing that one too, even though the fact that I put it together means it's nowhere near the same quality (it was also handy for dissassembling and putting in the suitcase back when we could travel places). I also have the sparkly green GSP strat from here a year ago, which just feels like a different kind of guitar. The one I enjoy least is a Classic Player 50s strat, which is obviously much higher quality than the others, but just doesn't suit me.
The thing is that the latter has a value in itself that the others don't have, it's clear that they only have value as parts, which seems unfair to me, but that's the market for you. "Quality" might be an ambiguous concept, but resale value is quite clear.
I believe a Marxist would refer to it as the distinction between use value and exchange value.
Something slightly aligned is that I wonder whether an advantage that vintage guitars have is that they've fifty or sixty years of tweaking behind them, and that a lot of the quality of an early fifties tele, for example, is partly the Fender factory and partly love and care from the same hands that might be assembling a partscaster, with much the same results.
*I'm not saying I have any respect for their opinion, I can just imagine them having it.
Also, if you're keen to play a partscaster, you'll probably want to select the parts.
it's lovely, and is one of my best guitars