It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
im looking to put in a 4.2kw array and battery. I’ve been quoted £9500 which is a bit much I think.
On a sunny day like the past few the panels have been generating up to 30kw/h of power in 24 hours. I've only ever used a fraction of that, with the remainder going mostly back into the grid aside from whatever is needed to charge the battery to full.
Only niggle so far has been the massive delays with the Powergrid in terms of getting me registered as an energy exporter so I can actually start getting paid for all the kw/h I'm putting back into the grid! Apparently the applications used to come back within a week, but such has been the explosion in demand with all the new solar installs going on it's now around 8 weeks expected turnaround time!
appreciate the response.
These days, feed-in tariffs are much lower (though generally still higher than a market rate) so the aim should normally be to maximise self-consumption. You save more by not buying from the grid than you lose by not selling to it. So a split system with east-facing and west-facing panels is ideal: you start generating significant power earlier in the day, and keep on generating well after a south-facing panel has given up.
Of course, given your battery setup, the normal considerations don't apply. On the down side you are generating a bit less than you would with 12 south-facing panels; on the up side you are maximising self-consumption which means less wear and tear on the battery (they have a limited number of charge/discharge cycles before they need replacement). It's probably six of one and half a dozen of the other. And in your case, you don't really have a choice anyway.
We had 8 north-facing panels installed when the house was built but no battery. There seems no pressing need to expand or add a battery insofar as Tasmania is zero-carbon electricity anyway (we have hydro, wind, and solar, with lots more wind and pumped hydro on the way to allow major power exports to mainland Australia) so there is no environmental benefit, just the cost factor, and that's not compelling.
The one reason we are seriously considering a battery system is bushfires. If the power goes off, we lose our house water (tank), our garden water (dam) and our bore water, so firefighting becomes problematic. Yes, we have petrol-powered pumps, but it would be much better to have a battery which, so long as we pay the extra to get a mains-isolation switch* put in, would let us simply turn on a tap or pump unlimited water from the bore.
(* Normally, even though you have solar and a battery, when the mains power goes off, the house power goes off. This is a regulatory requirement to avoid electrocuting linesmen in the street. But you can either go completely off-grid, or else have a special isolation switch.)
Some graphs from the app to give crude illustrations...
Firstly, this is the month so far showing total generation, how much I used myself (green) and how much was exported to the grid (yellow). You can clearly see the days where I charged my EV car where the green is higher.
This one is how much I've used form self generated power (green) and power that I've imported from the grid (red)...
These are the same graphs but for each month of the year to date instead of daily...
And these are year to date stats for a) how much I've earned exporting energy to the grid, and b) how much I've paid year to date on importing energy from the grid (doesn't include the scandalous standing charges though!)...
A)
I'm seriously looking at getting some panels fitted next year, probably something in the region of 6kw with 9.5kWh of battery storage and a diverter to let me heat the water cylinder.
I reckon it'll mean I use no electricity or gas in the summer months, with a significant reduction in electricity from April until the end of September.
That sort of system is likely to be expensive though (I'd estimate about £12-14k) so the payback time will be long (perhaps 20 years?).
It would also push our EPC rating up to a B which would be pretty good for a 100 year old house
i had a quote last year from the Council’s local supplier for panels and battery(s).
I asked for the Batteries to not be in the loft, and to be either on our external wall or inside our adjacent garage. they tried to do that, said it would cost a fortune, that I would need to get in a builder for various things and then said no. I said it was a fire risk and then if nolofts went into design codes then houses might not get is unable. They said unlikely to codify non-loft installation of batterie. Any way they said no thanks to me and gave me my £150 deposit back.
in March this year British Standards come out and say don’t put batteries in lofts in the new British Standard! It will be interesting where the industry goes with this.
Still undecided about battery - I'd save a further 4 units per day average if I went that route. At that rate, I need to look into the Octopus Flux type scheme to buy / sell.
Total Generation / Consumption for that period looks like this.
https://i.imgur.com/ifLiE3R.jpeg
3.3 MW/h "saved" - difference between Generated and Exported figure = £890 @ average KW/h unit charge of 27p
5 MW/h exported @ 15p per unit = £750.
Weather's not as good this year!