It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
A big difference in gliding compared to powered flight, is the position you are seated in and what that does in terms of feel. Sat in a spam can Cessna or Piper, you tend to feel like you are riding along in a chair (because you are), whereas since you are sitting in a fairly laid back position in a glider (this helps reduce the frontal area of the aircraft), you get a feeling of the wings sprouting from your shoulders, and this, in combination with the fact that it is your flying skill which keeps you airborne rather than your wallet and how much fuel you can afford to put in the thing, makes you feel more like a bird, so it is it is cheaper, more rewarding and a more visceral experience in general with that big unrestricted view through a fighter-like perspex canopy. You willl find too, that you have to use the rudder a lot more skilfully in a glider, since there is no propwash helping it be more effective, which means giving it a big bootful of rudder to overcome the adverse yaw of a big wingspan when you want to throw it into a steep turn. A big benefit to that too, is that there is no need to counter prop torque either.
What is also worth noting and what a lot of people tend to forget with gliders, is that since the basic principle of gliding is that you are always descending, but you seek to locate air that is rising faster than your descent rate, so you still climb (think of it like walking down an up escalator). But when you run out of rising air, you make a rapid dash to another potential area of lift, thus you spend as little time as possible in air which is not rising, and when you do that, you typically put on negative flaps and get the nose down to pick up a lot of speed for your dash to the new area of lift. Those dash speeds can easily top 160 knots in many performance gliders, which is actually a lot faster than many powered aeroplanes can manage, so the notion that it is only a serene floaty experience when flying a glider, could not be further from the truth. It can be, but it can be fairly fast and furious too.
It's also interesting to observe that you tend to chuck gliders about a lot more. Banked turns in order to stay in thermals are often very steep. Winch launches are very steep too and aerotows force you to learn how to fly in formation with another aircraft, so there are a fair few things in gliding which involve stuff you rarely get to do in a typical powered aeroplane.
Landing too is more of a challenge, since every one of them is basically similar to a forced landing in a powered aeroplane, requiring good circuit planning, because there is no 'going around' if you were to misjudge things. This inevitably turns you into a better than average pilot.
Last but not least, gliding gives you a better appreciation for weather and improves your knowledge of what the air mass is doing, since the more you know about it and the better your observation is, the longer you stay airborne which is a useful observational meteorology skill if you fly powered aeroplanes too.
A few months later when I went up in the Lancaster it was a completely different story. Couldn’t believe how much that pilot chucked it about for an older historic aircraft. That’s the difference between sitting static and moving around (I sat in every part of the Lanc throughout the flight) I didn’t puke but my God it was close and so much fun.
Mention of Biggin Hill reminds me that I tried to get into the RAF to train as a pilot in 1966,as I was about to leave school at 17.
I got on to an assessment group at Biggin Hill, four days of interviews, tests and medicals. I remember one of the tests was a crude early "video" game where you had to use a joystick to follow a moving dot on a screen with a gun-sight.
I passed everything except the eyesight test, so they said I couldn't be a pilot or navigator, but I could apply for anything else in the RAF career portfolio. Stupidly, I said "no thanks" as it was fly or bust for me at the time.
I've often wondered since how my life would have been different if I'd accepted...
I did manage to become bar-billiards champion of the group in the mess, so it wasn't a total write-off!
It worked pretty well and I felt fine for ages until my lesson this morning. I haven’t flown for over 2 months and the turbulence was quite strong this morning. We were doing low level navigation simulating bad weather (ironically!) and tracked a small portion of the M25 at about 850ft. Was quite good even though I felt a bit rough!
Excellent! That spitfire flies over my parents house in Kent everyday in the summer. Would love to go up in it.
i remember the selection centre well! The building is still there which is good. I have heard that some of the assessments were pretty tough so it sounds like you did really well. Just such a shame that your eyesight test let you down. You can only but wonder how things might have been but hopefully you have had good times along the way!
First time doing circuits, EGTR is a bit "challenging" because of noise abatement, but it felt really good, just follow the green bits... It possibly helps that I grew up close by and know the area.
Mad crosswind, not too strong (7-8kt) but almost square on to the runway. I rather enjoyed the challenge and my instructor didn't have to do anything too drastic, my penultimate landing was nearly all me!
He is happy, he said the crosswind compensation made it hard for me to focus to the flare at the very end, but he feels I got a lot out of it. Hopefully when the wind is less challenging we'll be able to focus more on the eyes to the end of the runway bit.
For my last landing I was a bit high, I was concentrating on the crossed controls which makes more sense in practice than on paper, but I probably left too much power in because I was worried about slipping too much. It's easy to say "just look outside" (nobody said that to me, I'm saying it to myself) but it's a skill to learn via practice.
It was also really interesting actually feeling like I was giving the rudder some for once and compensating with aileron and approaching the runway straight on. Quite a lot of this stuff is about not trusting your traditional senses.
So as usual, the new bits occupy most of my cognition but the previous bits became more natural. Fantastic fun and a real privilege, I never have buyer's remorse when I tap the card at the end.
The only time I looked at a gliding club after that, it seemed to involve lots of pushing aircraft around on the ground, and waiting for long periods of time for the chance of a 5-10 minute aero-tow and glide back to earth for another couple of hours worth of 'ground ops'
Is that still generally how you go about building up time and experience in order to obtain a gliding qualification ?
January was kind to me, managed to get two lessons in two weeks, you may call now me Johnny Circuits Nuts. Second week of circuits was calmer and opposite side so have now done both sides of the airfield (RH both times).
FI complimentary about my approaches and now it's all about the last few feet, but I'm feeling good and I feel every lesson I put more of the puzzle together which is probably the point. He's talking about looking further ahead and looking for the ground to "rise" in my peripheral vision, then hold it up and let the airspeed bleed off. Or something.
Sadly, TAF looking underwhelming for tomorrow.
[This space for rent]