It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
what a complete and utter load of shite
if being fat is not a side effect of some other medical condition or treatment then it's totally the fat fella's own fault.. he can either do something about it... or keep scoffing the pies and quaffing the ale...
it really is that simple..
I don't think that definition of obesity is necessarily correctly classified as a disabililty. certainly morbid obesity is disabling - as in so fat, you are likely to die from it.
Thing is, the powers that be are realising that wieght gain is a problem everywhere in the developed world, and its an area of medicine/health that will be increasingly in the spotlight. People get fat, they start to cost countries money. Something needs to change, cos no country with a publich health service (as in free for all at point of provision) can afford the emerging health problems that are direclty linked to high weight.
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Yeah, and I'II push you over and you'll be wriggling around flailing your arms in the air like a turtle stuck on it's back (Not legs, as, let's be realistic, they'll be too heavy eh)
What is a disability is an issue at work, for me, in various ways partly because managers have to record disability related and non disability related illnesses differently ( sickness absence rates being the great obsession of public sector management). It is largely self defined anyway, as I understand it, so an EU court ruling isn't that meaningful. A common example is asthma. Someone with asthma gets a chest infection they are sicker and longer off work than someone who doesn't have asthma who gets the same infection. So the asthma sufferer considers it to be disability related and it goes on a different part of the records. I doubt if many people would consider mild asthma to be a disability or that someone with it would get a disabled parking space,etc but in that context ( the infection) I'd say it is.
Even so I struggle a bit with obesity as a disability because you would normally consider disabilities to be permanent or long term conditions. So, missing a leg is a disability, having a broken leg isn't. Obesity is potential a temporary and treatable condition.
One anecdote. I have two people at work of a similar age (approx 50) both of whom have arthritis in their knees. Very hard to really say but, to me, they seem to have very similar conditions. Their attitude toward it is very different though. With the one I doubt if many people are aware of her condition as it rarely stops her doing stuff. With the other her disability is almost always in the start of many conversations i.e. it stops her doing things. Rather conveniently at times it seems.
My own 2p's is to stick as far as possible to physical impairment. Keep it at the individual level of responsibility. (I.e. don't go down the route of employers' responsibilities, and state welfare entitlements.)
It's not to say there are not social forces exerting a pressure, there are -- obesity is a new problem... it didn't come from nowhere... people didn't become "morally sloppy" fat people in a generation just as a result of multiple individual choices. Something is pushing people into obesity. But that's another debate.
I don't want to see someone with a BMI of 34 say to themselves, "oh fuck it, if I hit BMI 35 I'll qualify for benefits and I'll be entitled to an extra big seat at work, so it's not worth trying to lose weight."
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
If you don't have enough to eat, you get thin. We are not cress, we don't bulk up through sunlight alone.