It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The jet is something different altogether.
The gain master and studio pro came out at the same time. For gain master think Robben Ford. Studio pro was more Mayer like. According to Guitarist mag that is.
I can imagine it also working very well with pedals if required.
I have played through a number of them, including 22 watt combos, a 35 watt head and a £4000 50 watt head. None of them 'worked' for me.
I think there is always a risk with high-end amps that they can can disappoint - in fact apart from a Soldano Lucky 13 and a Samson era DC30, I struggle to think of instances where a very expensive amp really amazed me. But with Two Rocks the disappointment has always been enormous - I genuinely don't get what all the fuss is about.
It may be that how I play - and what I want to hear from an amp - just doesn't fit with their design philosophy. You may get along with them just fine - but don't buy on reputation or the opinion of others. Check out that they genuinely deliver what you want and that whatever that is, isn't available for much less money from another maker.
How did they disappoint you?
How did you find them to sound in comparison to the type of tones you usually go for?
What sort of tones usually float your boat and how didn't the Two Rocks deliver that for you?
The MkIII I used to own had stunningly good Fender-like cleans with a lovely sense 'bounce' under the fingers. Whilst it was bright and clear, it was never harsh, or 'hard' sounding in the mid-range. The Two Rocks I've played were both harsh and hard to my ears.
They share tone controls for both modes (as did the MkIII) and I found I could not get a simultaneously bright enough clean sound, without the drive sounding too thin and edgey.
The 22 watt models sounded physically small and started to lose clean headroom at what I would consider to be nowhere near gigging volume - the bigger ones had no such problem but sounded lifeless at lower levels.
The impression I have is that the brand has built an enviable reputation on the back of people like John Mayer but when it comes down to it, I believe their amps are simply not worthy of the hype.
I'm not one of those people who will tell you that a Squier Vintage Modified Strat is better than something from the Custom Shop. I believe with dearer equipment, you mostly get what you pay for. The Matchless DC30 sounded utterly magnificent, as did the Soldano Lucky 13 - you will note they are very different from each other, so it isn't about the 'type' of amp with me - and there are many other expensive amps that I've liked, without neccessarily being bowled over by them.
If this all sounds a bit damning towards Two Rock - I'm afraid it is. I must emphasise I've not tried the model you refer to - but unless it is significantly different from the ones I've played, I wouldn't entertain buying one.
I have been seeing a bit of a trend that they tend to divide opinion a little.
I usually think that if that's the case, then there has to be something in it, or something that's not kinda normal in their tone.
No smoke without fire etc.
As always, every model is different so to generalise based on having played a number of different models, none of which is the one you're considering, is misleading.
Only you can really decide. Personally I wasn't keen on Matt Schofield's sound even when hearing it live through his 4k amp. I still bought the Studio Pro, though, because I liked the sound. Same with the Cornford Hurricane. Never liked the little Cornfords or the Hellcat sound but the Hurricane does it for me.
YMMV, of course.
Is there an East Anglia amp-fest happening??
Whereabouts?
Cheers