It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Actually that can be a bit harsh. So lets go with all nuts should be bone. Well bone isn't consistent, and some don't find it ethical. Next conclusion, all nuts should be consistent and some nuts should be ethical.
After that it is all down to personal preference
Instagram
I bet my fingers are fatter than yours and I can play a mandolin!
So if you wait until the dealers are blowing them out cheap because most people can't stand them, it's an easy and not expensive job to replace the tuners and nut, and then you can have wider string spacing too.
You can if you choose also have the hideous headstock signature removed and the front refinished, which is purely cosmetic and would cost a bit more, but is least expensive if done while the nut and tuners are off.
Does that make more sense?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
@WezV. Yes, I agree it's all personal preference, but I'm trying to get enough info to maske a choice, and as per usual when I think about guitar nuts, going on the ruddy interwbnet just gets me dizzy going in circles.
@Panama_Jack666. I know I answered it in my first post, but I was hoping there'd be a fairly cheap guitar which would make it easier for me.
@ICBM. I see. Thanks. I don't really like SG's though. More importantly, even if/when the price does drop I'll still only be able to afford a picture of one if it's in a magazine.