Pat Metheny on chord tones

What's Hot
bingefellerbingefeller Frets: 5723
Listen to the whole lesson but from 15 minutes on is where he talks about chord tones.
0reaction image LOL 2reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom

Comments

  • BradBrad Frets: 659
    I think this one of the best things on Youtube. Those of us on a quest to be better improvisers (regardless of genre) should be made to listen to this repeatedly on a daily basis :-)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Brad;773492" said:
    I think this one of the best things on Youtube. Those of us on a quest to be better improvisers (regardless of genre) should be made to listen to this repeatedly on a daily basis :-)
    deffo.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BarneyBarney Frets: 616
    such a great player...the way he outlines them chords... !
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom
  • Barney said:
    such a great player...the way he outlines them chords... !

    It sounds so good and not typical of arpeggio or triad playing.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • He gives some great advice in that video, and the playing is really inspiring.

    I'm not sure about how well this works as a lesson though. I've had lessons like this in the past, where the teacher blows your mind with some amazing licks and runs, and talks through the theory, but what is missing is exactly how you implement it.

    So the missing link for me is, how to go from playing arpeggios over the changes to playing 'in there' rather than 'floating over the top'. I'd want a teacher to break it down more, in the way that, for example, Jimmy Bruno does.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • mellowsun said:
    He gives some great advice in that video, and the playing is really inspiring.

    I'm not sure about how well this works as a lesson though. I've had lessons like this in the past, where the teacher blows your mind with some amazing licks and runs, and talks through the theory, but what is missing is exactly how you implement it.

    So the missing link for me is, how to go from playing arpeggios over the changes to playing 'in there' rather than 'floating over the top'. I'd want a teacher to break it down more, in the way that, for example, Jimmy Bruno does.
    Arpeggios will get you sounding in there. Metheny says in that lesson that a lot of what he plays is chord tones. If you're outlining the changes then you will be in there. Rhythm and timing has a good deal to do with it too. At one point he says that you can play anything and, if you have good rhythm and timing, it will sound good.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • RockerRocker Frets: 4985
    Pity the sound quality of PM talking is so poor. Lots of irritating background noises too. Could or should do better in that regard.
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. [Albert Einstein]

    Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

    2reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • bingefellerbingefeller Frets: 5723
    edited September 2015
    @Rocker, try playing it through your Russ Andrews approved hifi system and it'll sound like Metheny is in your house.
    2reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • RockerRocker Frets: 4985
    My system is nowhere near Russ Andrews approval @bingefeller, :) With PMs access to decent recording equipment, the sound *should* be better than it is. Surely they know how to record vocals by now....
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. [Albert Einstein]

    Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

    0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Rocker said:
    My system is nowhere near Russ Andrews approval @bingefeller, :) With PMs access to decent recording equipment, the sound *should* be better than it is. Surely they know how to record vocals by now....

    I don't know if you're taking the piss but this was an informal recording between teacher and student.  It's probably from the late 80s or early 90s and most likely done on a cassette recorder. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • RockerRocker Frets: 4985
    No piss taking my friend. I was not aware of the recording history. The guy know his stuff, just a pity the recording quality is so poor.
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. [Albert Einstein]

    Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • carloscarlos Frets: 3451
    Arpeggios will get you sounding in there. Metheny says in that lesson that a lot of what he plays is chord tones. If you're outlining the changes then you will be in there. Rhythm and timing has a good deal to do with it too. At one point he says that you can play anything and, if you have good rhythm and timing, it will sound good.
    In one of those Krantz audio lessons he's talking about two solos he did in other people's records: one he had a chord chart and pretty much followed it, in the other he just turned up and played. On both he sounds "on key" and like Wayne Krantz. Of course, his rhythm and timing is amazing and the ear doesn't care that much about a few outside trips if the rest is working.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom
  • Glad he was able to take time from making the Lethal Weapon films to record this.

    Seriously though cheers for posting this, some really interesting stuff. I like the amount of emphasis he puts on rhythm, Al Di Meola similarly mentions it all the time in his lessons. I think there is some great stuff we can take from it, regardless of the style we play.

    I wish I had the hours available every day that he talks about though!
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.