It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
They're aren't many about but Anderson's suffer from savage depreciation.
But they stopped making them because Gibson threatened to sue, so in theory they should be worth more due to rarity.
Conventional used guitar pricing wisdom is around 60% of the new price- so a £3k guitar would be worth £1800 or so.
But it is an Anderson so it might be worth less.
But it is an Bulldog so it might be worth a bit more.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
It seems Gibson's litigators are challenged more than their guitar makers.
I am guessing here but I imagine Tom simply couldn't afford to mount a defence.
They now have a model called a Bobcat has 2 or 3 knobs rather than 4.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
All the ones I saw seemed to be in close to mint condition, which would obviously be reflected in the price.
I think the issue with Gibson and court threats is that small firms will just roll over and drop the model - they only make a few a year any way - Anderson build around 800 guitars a year, so chances are that will equate to less than 50 Bulldogs - The profit on that is less than a phone call to a top lawyer to defend this case - Hence Gibson win just by issuing the threat - PRS could afford to take Gibson to task on it - most others can't