It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
Football is rubbish.
Nowadays I know what a crotchet, a quaver, a rest and a treble clef are. I know vaguely the pitch of the notes. Apart from that...not a ruddy clue.
I've never needed it for guitar though - but that's just me and the style I play.
Not sure it is a necessity as such but surely depends on what you are trying to achieve - Playing 3 chord pop songs in a pub and you'll probably never need it - Playing pro in a pit orchestra for theater work etc then almost certainly required - Not a bad asset to have as and when required - The more serious you are as a player, and the more you can't read, then the more you need to rely on your ear - Nothing wrong with that and maybe not a pure answer to this
Guitar world is full of great players who can't or could not read - but some will tell you to learn to read so it is an asset available as and when required, but also develop your ear - Like many things in life, develop yourself as best as you can
Feedback
My sight reading ability isn't what it was when I was a 14 year old classical guitarist, mind...
Most players who can't will claim that their self-determined learning has enabled them to become better players and have highly developed ears. I doubt that's really true - they are just trying to excuse their laziness of having not put the 'hard yards' in at an early stage.
I've been playing lots of mandolin recently so I'm figuring out fiddle tunes, obviously there's usually no tab so I have to struggle through. I'm improving though.
I think tab is a really useful tool & makes guitar accessible for newcomers. (whether this reliance becomes a hindrance as you progress is open to debate).
I'm sure I read somewhere that tab started in the 1300s for lute/lyre players so it's an established part of musical history.
Feedback
Learnt to read whilst laid up last year, can read notes a bit slowly. Not good with timing. Not fussed about that though, more interesting in seeing other people's ideas in context, i.e. notes, over chords, or chords over chords, subs etc.
Development - depends on context really as G4U says. For me not essential, I learnt plenty of theory without being able to read, which was the essential framework for me. But there is a whole ton of learning and seeing other's viewpoints to be had by reading so I'd say it's at least worthwhile having the ability to read to some extent.
Do I use it? Yes. I score arrangements for our keyboard/sax player who can read music, but can't transcribe.
I play classical guitar and clarinet so reading music is required there. I also play in a big band, where I get away with playing in a more 'band' way I suppose, but everyone else is reading from notation, especially when new music is introduced.
If the flip side to music is tab, and you learn from tab, I'd still say learning to read music to some level allows you to pretty much play music without hearing it, getting the positions from the tab and the rhythm from the notation.
These days, I'd rather notation, even if I have to work out the chords/notes, as tab seems very lacking in comparison.
I've never bothered reading music whilst playing guitar though. Whether or not you need to depends on what sort of guitarist you want to be.
I’m so bored I might as well be listening to Pink Floyd
“Theory is something that is written down after the music has been made so we can explain it to others”– Levi Clay