Line 6 HX Effects Vs Boss MS-3

What's Hot
BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
edited March 2021 in Digital & Modelling
I'm eyeing up one of these as a pedalboard controller and was wondering if anyone had compared them?

I'd have midi control over all FX Loop pedals so wouldn't need to lose a loop for 4CM. Plus both of them will switch my amp channels. It was more form factor and quality of onboard effects I was thinking. I have a Timeline and an Expanse so happy with delay and reverb, more the other stuff and the esoteric one offs! 

Cheers!!

The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
«1

Comments

  • thomasw88thomasw88 Frets: 2335
    edited March 2021
    my pal has a ms3 and I had a HX.

    We went into a rehearsal studio last year, just to try out bits n bobs of gear so got to hear them both.

    Soundwise I thought the HX edged it with regards to all of the fx.
    Ease of use - Personally I thought the HX  is much easier to use.  He said he didn't find the MS3 hard to program.

    Formfactor wise the MS3 is much smaller and if you can get your head around the interface might do the job.

    I do think there is a bit of tone alteration with both units though.

    How many loops do you need?   If it's two I'd go for the Boss GT1000core which is by far and away a better all round device than either  the HX or MS3 imho.  Albeit more pricey.   But I would personally say it's worth it as it's a great bit of kit.


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • EricTheWearyEricTheWeary Frets: 16303
    FWIW in my travels I had spotted someone doing a video of this...

    https://youtu.be/90iz3npOGkA


    ...no idea how useful that is. 
    Tipton is a small fishing village in the borough of Sandwell. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • CarpeDiemCarpeDiem Frets: 296
    I haven't directly compared both units, but I bought an MS3 as a result of form factor, quality, and functionality. I have set mine up so that I can use individual switches to toggle within patches to switch a series of effects on or off, eg clean/clean with modulation, loop 1/loop 1 with delay. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
    thomasw88 said:
    my pal has a ms3 and I had a HX.

    We went into a rehearsal studio last year, just to try out bits n bobs of gear so got to hear them both.

    Soundwise I thought the HX edged it with regards to all of the fx.
    Ease of use - Personally I thought the HX  is much easier to use.  He said he didn't find the MS3 hard to program.

    Formfactor wise the MS3 is much smaller and if you can get your head around the interface might do the job.

    I do think there is a bit of tone alteration with both units though.

    How many loops do you need?   If it's two I'd go for the Boss GT1000core which is by far and away a better all round device than either  the HX or MS3 imho.  Albeit more pricey.   But I would personally say it's worth it as it's a great bit of kit.


    Interesting stuff, thank you. I'll have a look at the core but it seems bigger than the others. I don't need any amp tones, just FX and amp control. Thank you though. 

    The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
    FWIW in my travels I had spotted someone doing a video of this...

    https://youtu.be/90iz3npOGkA


    ...no idea how useful that is. 
    That's great, thank you I shall have a watch!

    The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
    CarpeDiem said:
    I haven't directly compared both units, but I bought an MS3 as a result of form factor, quality, and functionality. I have set mine up so that I can use individual switches to toggle within patches to switch a series of effects on or off, eg clean/clean with modulation, loop 1/loop 1 with delay. 
    Yeah, some of the functionality looks pretty cool like that. Thanks :)

    The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • thomasw88thomasw88 Frets: 2335
    edited March 2021
    Boromedic said:
    thomasw88 said:
    my pal has a ms3 and I had a HX.

    We went into a rehearsal studio last year, just to try out bits n bobs of gear so got to hear them both.

    Soundwise I thought the HX edged it with regards to all of the fx.
    Ease of use - Personally I thought the HX  is much easier to use.  He said he didn't find the MS3 hard to program.

    Formfactor wise the MS3 is much smaller and if you can get your head around the interface might do the job.

    I do think there is a bit of tone alteration with both units though.

    How many loops do you need?   If it's two I'd go for the Boss GT1000core which is by far and away a better all round device than either  the HX or MS3 imho.  Albeit more pricey.   But I would personally say it's worth it as it's a great bit of kit.


    Interesting stuff, thank you. I'll have a look at the core but it seems bigger than the others. I don't need any amp tones, just FX and amp control. Thank you though. 
    You can switch the amp tones off.   
    Sound wise, the GT1000 fx  are next generation compared to the MS3 which is based upon the GT100  I believe.    I've also had a GT100 in the years gone by and it was ok, but I found it a bit bland soundwise.

    I  would state that so far I prefer the GT1000 over the HX effects for sounds.

    Footprint wise, the GT1000core is a lot smaller than the HX,   the MS3 is the smallest
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • JotaJota Frets: 465
    I had the MS-3 and switched to the HX Stomp because I had to go direct.
    Still think Boss has way better switching options The interface is not pretty and the small screen can be hard to see but, after I had to program a 4hour show with 10 presets without the PC software that wasn't out yet, I found it quite easy to use.
    I also loved the form factor and all the extra inputs for aux switches and expression pedals.
    At the time I had a hard time replicating with the Stomp what I did with the MS-3 because I had built the song arragements around the way it worked.
    As for effects, I really liked the overdrives/distortions of the MS-3. Although HX has a lot more options, I don't think they are better but they are always adding more stuff.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • monquixotemonquixote Frets: 17718
    tFB Trader
    I have a GT-1000 CORE and a Helix. I've also owned a GT-100

    I think the GT-1000 has the best sounding FX, but all of them are pretty decent.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
    edited March 2021
    thomasw88 said:
    Boromedic said:
    thomasw88 said:
    my pal has a ms3 and I had a HX.

    We went into a rehearsal studio last year, just to try out bits n bobs of gear so got to hear them both.

    Soundwise I thought the HX edged it with regards to all of the fx.
    Ease of use - Personally I thought the HX  is much easier to use.  He said he didn't find the MS3 hard to program.

    Formfactor wise the MS3 is much smaller and if you can get your head around the interface might do the job.

    I do think there is a bit of tone alteration with both units though.

    How many loops do you need?   If it's two I'd go for the Boss GT1000core which is by far and away a better all round device than either  the HX or MS3 imho.  Albeit more pricey.   But I would personally say it's worth it as it's a great bit of kit.


    Interesting stuff, thank you. I'll have a look at the core but it seems bigger than the others. I don't need any amp tones, just FX and amp control. Thank you though. 
    You can switch the amp tones off.   
    Sound wise, the GT1000 fx  are next generation compared to the MS3 which is based upon the GT100  I believe.    I've also had a GT100 in the years gone by and it was ok, but I found it a bit bland soundwise.

    I  would state that so far I prefer the GT1000 over the HX effects for sounds.

    Footprint wise, the GT1000core is a lot smaller than the HX,   the MS3 is the smallest
    Ahhh, I was confusing the GT1000 Core with the bigger Boss with the built in EXP pedal. Yes it is small actually, although only 3 footswitches, plus it's midi via TRS, not deal breakers though and it's cool that it has the 500 series algorithms. Does it have all of the 500 series Delays, Verbs and Modulations? It's a lot of cash though when I don't need the amp modelling, delays or reverbs. It is cool though, I could be persuaded if it could replace my Expanse (Wet Reverb) or Timeline.

    I'm still leaning towards the MS3, as it's cheaper and does what I need, When you say the MS3 and the HX FX change your sound, can you elaborate at all? That bit concerns me a bit.

    Thank you for your suggestions and sharing your experiences!

    The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
    Jota said:
    I had the MS-3 and switched to the HX Stomp because I had to go direct.
    Still think Boss has way better switching options The interface is not pretty and the small screen can be hard to see but, after I had to program a 4hour show with 10 presets without the PC software that wasn't out yet, I found it quite easy to use.
    I also loved the form factor and all the extra inputs for aux switches and expression pedals.
    At the time I had a hard time replicating with the Stomp what I did with the MS-3 because I had built the song arragements around the way it worked.
    As for effects, I really liked the overdrives/distortions of the MS-3. Although HX has a lot more options, I don't think they are better but they are always adding more stuff.
    Thanks for the info, yeah the extra switching stuff interests me a lot. I'm leaning MS3 as its cheaper too!

    The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • BoromedicBoromedic Frets: 4923
    I have a GT-1000 CORE and a Helix. I've also owned a GT-100

    I think the GT-1000 has the best sounding FX, but all of them are pretty decent.
    Thanks mate, so many choices and no definitive answer!

    The yard is nothing but a fence, the sun just hurts my eyes...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • NelsonPNelsonP Frets: 3412
    edited March 2021
    I've considered both of these. My feeling is that HX beats the MS3 by a narrow margin, because ease of use, scribble strips, better pitch shifting (post 3.0 firmware), but the Boss has it beaten on form factor, power options (lower current draw and the line 6 adapter has its own gravity) and maybe the quality of some of the drives.

    Both have A/D D/A conversion, so will have some impact on your tone. Probably marginal?

    All of the above is based on reviews and Internet wisdom only. Interested to hear more views from those who actually have experience of them.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • JotaJota Frets: 465
    I also thought the sound of the MS-3 was better. You noticed the buffers but they added something nice. I always struggle with the sound of the HX Stomp and even messed with the Global EQ for a while (still use it with HX amps).
    I'm not talking effects here, just the sound of the unit without any effect. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • jeztone2jeztone2 Frets: 2160
    edited April 2021
    I had the MS-3. I didn’t use much on it apart from the compressor and delays. I had my drives and Fuzz in the loops and an M5 on midi. Aside from the M5 misbehaving with midi it worked a treat. But I decided on an adventure with a Helix LT and sold it on in a moment of madness. 

    But the thing I like about it is in preset mode it’s 4 switches in a row. So my muscle memory didn’t get confused. 

    The 2+2 stacked format of the HX in preset mode makes the unit unusable for me. I’d have to buy a midi controller. Then it defeats the whole object of a compact fx unit. 

    I’m convinced Yamaha/Line 6 force their employees to bind their feet. Because I’m really not sure how someone with size 11’s singing backing vocals operates it. I mean it’s two rows of 4 pedals to acces presets. Surely it’s the most obvious thing to have the bottom row all presets and the top row for utility functions. I mean that’s what Boss do. That’s what my old Digitech RP-1 did. That’s what my TC Nova did. 

    But no, it’s a hideous design flaw. Yet so obvious. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • meltedbuzzboxmeltedbuzzbox Frets: 10340
    Does the ms-3 still have a gap between patch changes? That was quite annoying.
    The menu was a little finicky on the ms-3 but you do get used to it. I seem to recall loop placement couldn't be moved within the interface, it was fixed to certain switches which wasn't the end of the world for me but it did annoy @impmann ;

    The boss did have some unique effects which the hx cannot do and vice versa.

    I preferred the drives on the boss unit (surprisingly as I find most single boss drive pedals awful, especially the ds1 and sd1)

    Personally I'm not the biggest fan of the line 6 fx in general (I own a helix not a fx). I tend to use the classic fx more than the new ones.

    That said I think the boss is awful for phaser and flanger and few other effects were a bit arse

    I would recommend you try both. Or possibly look at a selection of pedals and a switcher. Unless it's for bedroom playing, then I'd drop the switcher



    The Bigsby was the first successful design of what is now called a whammy bar or tremolo arm, although vibrato is the technically correct term for the musical effect it produces. In standard usage, tremolo is a rapid fluctuation of the volume of a note, while vibrato is a fluctuation in pitch. The origin of this nonstandard usage of the term by electric guitarists is attributed to Leo Fender, who also used the term “vibrato” to refer to what is really a tremolo effect.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • jeztone2 said:
    I had the MS-3. I didn’t use much on it apart from the compressor and delays. I had my drives and Fuzz in the loops and an M5 on midi. Aside from the M5 misbehaving with midi it worked a treat. But I decided on an adventure with a Helix LT and sold it on in a moment of madness. 

    But the thing I like about it is in preset mode it’s 4 switches in a row. So my muscle memory didn’t get confused. 

    The 2+2 stacked format of the HX in preset mode makes the unit unusable for me. I’d have to buy a midi controller. Then it defeats the whole object of a compact fx unit. 

    I’m convinced Yamaha/Line 6 force their employees to bind their feet. Because I’m really not sure how someone with size 11’s singing backing vocals operates it. I mean it’s two rows of 4 pedals to acces presets. Surely it’s the most obvious thing to have the bottom row all presets and the top row for utility functions. I mean that’s what Boss do. That’s what my old Digitech RP-1 did. That’s what my TC Nova did. 

    But no, it’s a hideous design flaw. Yet so obvious. 
    You can assign any footswitch to do whatever you want in the command centre.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • impmannimpmann Frets: 12694
    Cant comment on the Line6 thing, but I thought the Boss was terrible.
    The menu system was over complicated, did my nut in and wasn’t as flexible as I wanted. The sounds were in the ‘generic’ category - sorry but Boss can make some wonderful effects but I struggled to get anything out of it that truly wowed me. 
    I sent mine back under the 30day distance selling thing - honestly I hated it.

    For transparency, I spent a king’s ransom on a Gigrig G2 system instead. Imho, best investment I ever made..
    Never Ever Bloody Anything Ever.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • thomasw88thomasw88 Frets: 2335
    edited April 2021
    Boromedic said:
    thomasw88 said:
    Boromedic said:
    thomasw88 said:
    my pal has a ms3 and I had a HX.

    We went into a rehearsal studio last year, just to try out bits n bobs of gear so got to hear them both.

    Soundwise I thought the HX edged it with regards to all of the fx.
    Ease of use - Personally I thought the HX  is much easier to use.  He said he didn't find the MS3 hard to program.

    Formfactor wise the MS3 is much smaller and if you can get your head around the interface might do the job.

    I do think there is a bit of tone alteration with both units though.

    How many loops do you need?   If it's two I'd go for the Boss GT1000core which is by far and away a better all round device than either  the HX or MS3 imho.  Albeit more pricey.   But I would personally say it's worth it as it's a great bit of kit.


    Interesting stuff, thank you. I'll have a look at the core but it seems bigger than the others. I don't need any amp tones, just FX and amp control. Thank you though. 
    You can switch the amp tones off.   
    Sound wise, the GT1000 fx  are next generation compared to the MS3 which is based upon the GT100  I believe.    I've also had a GT100 in the years gone by and it was ok, but I found it a bit bland soundwise.

    I  would state that so far I prefer the GT1000 over the HX effects for sounds.

    Footprint wise, the GT1000core is a lot smaller than the HX,   the MS3 is the smallest
    Ahhh, I was confusing the GT1000 Core with the bigger Boss with the built in EXP pedal. Yes it is small actually, although only 3 footswitches, plus it's midi via TRS, not deal breakers though and it's cool that it has the 500 series algorithms. Does it have all of the 500 series Delays, Verbs and Modulations? It's a lot of cash though when I don't need the amp modelling, delays or reverbs. It is cool though, I could be persuaded if it could replace my Expanse (Wet Reverb) or Timeline.

    I'm still leaning towards the MS3, as it's cheaper and does what I need, When you say the MS3 and the HX FX change your sound, can you elaborate at all? That bit concerns me a bit.

    Thank you for your suggestions and sharing your experiences!
     I had and used an HX for about 2 years with one of the bands I play in.  On that board I had external drives and wah (as I preferred them to the HX) and used the HX for everything else.  Most of the effects are good enough on the HX but I didn;t like the Trem much and the Reverbs were fairly awful imo.   I did originally have the drive pedals in an fx loop but that never sounded quite right for me and I think definitely changed the character of the pedals.

    I always seemed to have to fiddle with the HX during a gig to get it sounding how I wanted.
    There is a delay in patch changing with the HX although snapshots are instant.
    I found the snapshots unusable as they always sounded/felt different in a gig situation than in the house.    

    I preferred my my other (main) board which had wah, drives, Strymon Mobius (for modulation) and a Boss DD500 for delays.
    I still have my main board as is.

    on the 2nd board I've replaced the HX  and Wah pedal with the Full Fat GT1000 (I did have a core but decided the extra footswitches were worth getting the full fat) and so far absolutely love it.  The delays are a bit more limited than the DD500 for sure but does everything I'd want to. 
    The modulations are also excellent -  I probably prefer the mobius a little in comparison but for a multi fx the GT is imho better than the line 6 side.  They compare pretty well to a Fractal FX8 I had a few years ago.

    I haven't noticed any tone loss with using external pedals and it doesn't seem to my ears to colour the sound despite not being true bypass.  I reckon I could use the GT1000 drives rather than my own pedals and I think they're a bit more natural sounding than the HX but I am just  a drive pedal junkie so... 

    I haven't gigged the GT1000 or played it in a band situation due to covid but  I'm certainly thinking it will play the part.

    For your use case, the core has 2 effects loop so a a core with 1 or 2 footswitches (little vein do a small formfactor FS7 with LED's) would allow you to use it for pretty much everything you want.  Patch changing is instant, it's actually easy to program once you get your head around it and it feels/looks/sounds great!

    As I said previously the MS3 is based upon the same effects as the GT100,  which is around 10 years old now. Having owned the GT100 and GT1000, I'd say the  newer GT1000 was a definite upgrade sound wise.



    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • JotaJota Frets: 465
    @meltedbuzzbox yes, there's always a gap between presets in almost every multi-fx unit but Boss had so many switching options that there's a great chance you don't need to change presets middle song.
    0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.