It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The other guitarist in my band grew tired of his Les Pauls weight and upper fret access...so has retired it in favour of his Epi SG. It looks and plays and sounds great to me. He does have a set of Bare Knuckles in there though and just upgraded the tuners though. A very decent gigging guitar now.
The P90s are also good, except they are quite dark and a little muddy.
My 96 LP has about 7 pieces making up the solid mahogany back. I think it's overly thick plastic finish let's it down more though. That said, every part has been replaced or upgraded over the years and it's a pretty ace little guitar
Instagram
If you are gigging with £2000 amps, then you should probably look at a £2000 Gibson Les Paul, but in both cases if you had £4000 you didn't need kicking around you'd buy the high-end gear anyhow and wouldn't be in here asking about Epiphone.
I own three Epiphones, all bought new over the years, respectively: -
A Les Paul Custom Pro in Alpine White, with new Probucker pickups, excellent build and sound, cost me £359, a tenth of the Gibson equivalent for approximately half the guitar..
An Epiphone Dot 335 copy, cost me £240, great sounding and great playing semi-hollow, substantially less than a 10th of its Gibson equivalent..
Epiphone G-400 SG copy, bought YEARS ago and I've no idea what it cost, not played it in ages but it looks great.
All are excellent playing and sounding guitars that cost a tiny fraction of a full-fat Gibson.
I also own one of the new more affordable Gibsons, a 2016 Studio Faded T in satin black. It is marginally superior to any epiphone i've played but also marginally more expensive. So if looking at a choice between a high-end Epi Les Paul and a basic Gibbon, I'd audition both.
There is a STAGGERING amount of snobbery over gear made in the Far East vs the USA which is really not justified by the difference in quality, the law of diminishing returns kicks in hard at about £400 these days.
If you have a spare £2000 lying around, buy and treasure a high-end Gibson, but if you are looking for an excellent instrument to learn on, gig with and basically do everything that you can do (without staring at the headstock or earning decent money from music to justify expensive gear) then don't be scared of Epiphone.
I also have an 2007 elitist though and it's in a totally different league. Plays much better than any other epiphone I've ever tried and feels a lot nicer. 2 piece back, 2 piece solid top with a 1 piece neck. I even like the headstock and the finish is pretty thin too.
http://i.imgur.com/xFeqTof.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/eYrC9Xk.jpg
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Twisted Imaginings - A Horror And Gore Themed Blog http://bit.ly/2DF1NYi
The SG is better built and has a much nicer overall feel having the faded Nitro finish but the Epiphone LP is a sturdy and reliable guitar, really good value for money. I am contemplating swapping the pickups but the limit still sits with me more than my gear!
This is what confuses me about epiphone - my bog standard 96 LP also has a solid maple top under a ligtly flamed veneer and it definitely has a mahogany neck. Other than being multiple pieces, its the proper Gibson recipe. But they seem to change spec quite often
I remember they revamped the range in 96 and they were getting pretty good reviews, I managed to convince my parents to get me one for my 16th birthday.
Instagram
I like that they're lighter than a proper one and don't mind the thinner neck. Only thing I don't like on them is the headstock - I was going to get the one on the standard I bought reshaped but ended up selling it before I got round to it!
Compared to my mate's 2016 Gibson LP Traditional, the Epiphone is quite noticeably lighter but still feels pretty solid. There is a definite heft to it, but not at Gibson level.
The neck profile on the Epiphone is slimmer than I have now found to be my preference too. My SG's neck is a little chunkier and it just fits me better. The only real negative I've found with the Epiphone is the finish on the neck, it's just that wee bit sticky feeling. But I only noticed this once I had the SG, which is still the nicest feeling guitar I've ever played (albeit that's not that many).
I would love a Faded Gibson LP, I reckon that's a hell of a guitar for the money... but it's double the price on my Epiphone.
I had a 2010 Epi 56 LP Gold Top - that was full of P90 joy and I loved it but had to sell to fund getting something different.
I've also had a 2003 Epi Dot which was a brilliant guitar.
A mate has an early 2000's Korina explorer and that thing is a beast of a guitar. It's simply brilliant.
However........... For the money I have to say in my experience a Vintage is better. My V100 is amongst the best guitars I've ever played. I know mine is a good one (having played other identical models). The quality is on par with an Epiphone but to me it plays and sounds so much better. After five years and hundreds of gigs it's still my main live guitar.