It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Robbie Savage: "How do you know? Did you play the game professionally? How many caps did you win?".
Ian Wright: Gives the English language a far greater kicking than any opponent.
Danny Mills: Everything is terrible, we're all doomed.
Alan Green: There was an article in either the Times or Telegraph a few years ago the gist of which was that nobody would voluntarily work with him.
Phil Neville: He may be Gary's brother but he hasn't got his charm, good looks or knowledge.
Rio Ferdinand: Oh please, oh please.
Jamie Redknapp. Is he paid by the word? If he was paid by the sensible word he'd starve.
Pat Nevin's really good as a co-commentator on 5 Live. Chris Waddle's alright, and Lawro can be quite funny. And I like Chris Sutton just because he's outspoken and cantankerous.
I can never make up my mind about Robbie Savage, I really like him on the show he does with Freddie Flintoff and Matthew Syed. But on 606 he can be an idiot and he sometimes gets quite aggressive with callers. I think he's basically not intelligent enough to understand what people are on about half the time.
Cannot stand Alan Green or the other fella on five live.
At uni, we'd mute the telly and put some music on - you can see that player has just dived, you don't need a commentator to verify that.
So I've seen a lot of football! The Pundits are a symptom of the modern commercial game. TV money has skewed the top team finances out of all proportion and the Pundits are part of what is served up to justify that coverage. Most of what is on tv is so far removed from 'the beautiful game' as to be selected highlights. Just think how much football is filmed each week compared to how much gets screened. Someone has to narrate the whole thing and try to remain interesting without jarring the audience (who can all do better). The formula seems to have settled on a presenter and a small squad of former players/managers who offer thier opinions to camera. Everyone gets paid a good chunk of change, rinse and repeat.
What am i even doing in a football thread....Jeez.
Gary Neville also know's what he's on about as well.
Robbie Savage - the sort of player you don't like unless he's playing for your side. Horrible.
I listened to him muller some halfwit who phoned in to 606 demanding the sacking of Mark Hughes cos Stoke weren't playing the "Stoke way" anymore. That whole "insert team, way" thing is bobbins anyway, which was Savage's point.
What do we think about Sky's Soccer Saturday then? Best thing on that is Chris Kamara. Unwitting comedy genius.
Thinking about it, I feel a few things have caused this situation.
F1 racing = a high speed parade with almost no overtaking or what would be reasonably described as 'racing'
Drug use in sport and the complete failure of sporting bodies to do anything about it. Bizarrely drug usage is allowed for certain medical conditions like asthma. It is remarkable how many top athletes 'suffer' from asthma and avail of the drug which, apparently, is performance enhancing.
It is getting harder and harder to 'believe' in what you see on the sports field. Professional cycling has long been discredited as has sprinting and power field sports. Yet top athletes, even discredited athletes, fill stadiums so the authorities find way around the rules to allow discredited athletes compete.
It has always unsettled me just how easily an athlete or sports person can change their nationality. Live for a few years in a country and you can then represent that country at the Olympic games. In the world of Rugby Union, C.J. Stander is a perfect example. I don't know the guy, he is likely a gentleman, but he is from South Africa. Yet he plays international rugby for Ireland and got selected and played for the GB&I Lions. I have no problem with him playing his rugby in Ireland but his playing for Ireland is distorting the actual level of player on the Irish team. And limiting the opportunities for Irish born players to represent Ireland. It would appear that this practice is widespread, the French soccer team has Algerians on it.
One positive feature of Rugby is the usage of video replays to determine foul play and scores. The crowd can go home after a game knowing that 'his foot was in touch before touching down' so the try was not awarded. The crowd understand that the referee and his officials cannot see everything but the use of technology reveals all. It is worth the few seconds holdup to get the decision right. Football is reluctant to use this technology even though it is in use in Rugby. The system that football is trialing appears to be something of a joke considering what is available. Football is blighted by stupid rules: a player removing his shirt in celebration of scoring a goal is penalized with a yellow card. Daft. Yet a player diving in the penalty area and deception of the referee gets away scott free most of the time.
Thinking about it, it is not a surprise that sport has died for me. The wonder is that it took so long for this to happen.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Never gets old
I think quite often they're better because they feel they have to try harder, in what is clearly a male-dominated arena.