It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Depends I think. I stripped my 90's US strat and the body was about 10 pieces. I've seen Mexican ones with nice 2 piece bodies. Both are covered with similar poly finishes.
Electronics on the USA models are better, and to be fair I think the modern USA models have improved a little.
I now have a Mexican neck on my US strat and I prefer it, not just the profile but the finishing is a little better.
I'm not sure 'higher end' always has some measurable quantity if you take the electronics out of the equation. Based on the last US Tele I played I'd say the quality of set up certainly wasn't a factor.
Aesthetically for a body or top less pieces does look nicer. But for tone, I'm not convinced. Given most Les Pauls are at least 3 pieces (two for the top and one for the back) though many are 4 or potentially more.
for resale-ability - yes
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
The bridge and tuners are different too and I think the nut.
Main point is that it's not the same model being made in different countries at different prices, they're different models regardless of country.
If you can comfortably afford the American pro or original then you're not throwing money away for nothing because of the country, it is a higher spec guitar.
Which is what muddies the water so much in this debate.
There's no good reason a guitar can't be crafted to a high standard in any country, it's all about business.
Sadly, the guys who are bold enough to buy something new often lose money and find it hard to sell in the future. Not all brands are as easy to sell as USA Fender or Gibson, but 'Made in the USA' seems to be taken as a mark of quality / pedigree?
exactly this. You can get distracted by spec sheets, but labour is the biggest factor
If you made the same guitar from the same materials with the same processes you would see a big difference in price just from the labour costs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_wage
How much is your time worth?
Instagram
There is no difference.
Its stupid people with too much money paying for a label.
Why are the stupid people also the ones with money?
Also, some people with cheaper guitars wnt to convince themselves that they're as good as any; some people with expensive guitars wnt to convince themselves they've not wasted their money.
With fender there's no debate really because they don't make the same model in different countries.
Also as with all luxury goods, someone normal can save up or max a credit card and someone rich can buy it casually, but neither situation explains the motivation of same, or the relative value for money.