Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google

Become a Subscriber!

Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!

Read more...

5 Les Paul's...

What's Hot
2»

Comments

  • blobbblobb Frets: 2955
    JB for me. 
    Feelin' Reelin' & Squeelin'
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 22913
    Any pics of the neck joints @WezV? ; They look intriguing.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • WezVWezV Frets: 16691
    Philly_Q said:
    Any pics of the neck joints @WezV? ; They look intriguing.
    i tend to do a full width  long tenon and round off the heel.  Not fully carved away, but comfier than a normal LP

    in progress


    LP custom from the back


    a previous example



    The hollowbody is a bit different.  it looks more like a traditional gibson join from the outside, but is still a wide tenon






    0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 22913
    Thanks Wez. :)  I'm all in favour of a full width long tenon.  I don't know how much difference it really makes but it just instinctively seems like a good idea.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • robertyroberty Frets: 10893
    WezV said:
    roberty said:
    So cool. I'd love a chambered Les Paul one day. Is it more 335ish than a regular one?
    hard to say on the custom as its not wired yet.  I got it strung last night for the first time so I could drill the bridge.  It definitely sounds different to a solid one at this point, but it is the most chambering I have done.  The different tailpiece changes things as well.  I'm just not sure which of those will translate to the amplified sound. 

    The hollowbody is a bit of an odd one.  Its built almost like a proper acoustic archtop, but I wasn't expecting much from the acoustic tone as the top is maple rather than spruce, its much smaller, and the f-holes are quite narrow which can choke acoustic efficiency.  It sounds great though.  very clear and bell like on single note runs, quite raucous when strummed hard.  The acoustic volume obviously isn't great, but the tone is much better than I hoped and it translates well when plugged in.  

    cm01 said:
    Number 3 for me please  ;)
    that one is definitely not going anywhere.  its a great guitar, but the shape was slightly off and the early relic finish isn't great.  good excuse to keep it for myself ;)   It originally had the mini-hums in the LPC, but I was keen to try the staples when the LPC got delayed.  I did consider swapping back to make the LPC a little more 50's, and take the pancake one back to 70's
    I played number 3 briefly and it is superb. Great guitar
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • TTBZTTBZ Frets: 2900
    cm01 said:
    Number 3 for me please  ;)
    Me too! Looks awesome.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • usedtobeusedtobe Frets: 3842
    I like number 3 most..
     so if you fancy a reissue of a guitar they never made in a colour they never used then it probably isn't too overpriced.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • flyingvflyingv Frets: 555
    Phwoar! Lester porn
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Oh, goodness that hollow body... can I call dibs if it is ever on the market? 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • WezVWezV Frets: 16691
    mattblair said:
    Oh, goodness that hollow body... can I call dibs if it is ever on the market? 
    I'm not sure dibs are allowed, and the next hollowbody will be something even more special
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.