It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Like all Dickens adaptations, Armando Iannucci's take on the story leaves out quite a lot of the book, and particularly skates over the darker aspects of the plot. A couple of the characterisations didn't quite work for me, but it's very enjoyable and has a top notch cast.
Ive seen it thrice too and love it and its premis , also very original score adds to the intial sense of unease , so sad about the composer johhan johhansson ... ;(
That said, I did watch Dark Waters on Prime last Friday.
Very good legal thriller based on true events and spanning a 20 year period from 1998.
Mark Ruffalo plays Robert Bilott, a Cincinnati attorney for a legal firm representing large chemical corporations in the US. He is approached by a farmer from West Virginia whose livestock have been dying from strange illnesses and deformities and who blames global chemical giant DuPont, who have a landfill site next to his farm. The farmer has failed to find any local legal traction so in desperation he reaches out to Bilott.
Bilott slowly and reluctantly starts looking into the allegations and soon finds out there is credibility to the farmer's claims. He sues DuPont who tries to bury him in a mountain of information in the hope that it'll take several decades to sift through a room full of paperwork.
There isn't a happy ending per se, but justice catches up with DuPont and it's certainly a film that makes you look at your frying pan in a very different light!
A David and Goliath story that's well told with excellent performances from all the main players. As with all films having a 'true story' plot I felt compelled to research the real events and the film seems to have been a decently accurate portrayal and the director resisted the temptation to over-dramatise events to make the story more exciting.
Well worth watching, if you like that kind of thing; I do and really enjoyed it.
There is no 'H' in Aych, you know that don't you? ~ Wife
Turns out there is an H in Haych! ~ Sporky
Bit of trading feedback here.
Obviously made to show off 3D, and does look spectacular but like watching a game (I have always liked flying mountains though), but stupid and predictable plot, cliched characters and performances. The kids liked it though, and a nice way to waste almost 2.5 hours on a rainy Saturday.
Her film Colombiana was rather good.
She also was a high spot in The Losers.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
The Battle of Algiers. A movie I'd read about for years in books as a ground breaking piece of docu drama without ever actually getting around to watching. It's currently on Prime and I was blown away by it. It's interesting in so many different ways, quite apart from being a damn good story well told. It must have been challenging to make and probably only possible due to the good will of many of the participants. It's black and white and subtitled but don't let that put you off, it's a thrilling bit of film making. Currently lining up some more of Gillo Pontecorvo's movies to watch.
Solid 7.5/10 for me. It’s complicated and doesn’t over-explain anything but if you’re paying attention it’s not that difficult. Typical Nolan-style cleverness, so if you like that you’ll be fine, if not then stay away. I pretty much called most of the second half at the midway point but still enjoyed it.
Shit.
1/10.
Predictable underdog story but a fun movie to watch with the kids (slapstick and fart gags).
This has probably been posted already on this thread (quite possibly by me!), but this film is free to watch on Amazon Prime.
This is the benchmark for all films IMO.
After all it has Jane Fonda floating around space in the noddy, getting 'tortured' by an orgasmatron, taking a pill so she can have smoking hand sex, getting pursued by the evil witch queen with clear lesbian intentions, evil kids with steel-teeth-biting dolls, some weird thing called the matmus, an evil wannabe named Duran Duran, various beauties all clearly spaced out and sat around puffing stuff, a cave bloke giving her some pleasure in the 'old fashioned way' and if your Mrs thinks you're a pervert for watching it, then there's even a semi-naked angel bloke for her to oggle at.
This film, if made into a 'Rocky Horror' type show, would sell out the West End for years.
Biopic of the Norwegian explorer who was the first to reach the South Pole. I'm quite interested in exploration so this sounded like a good watch, and there was some fairly interesting stuff from a historical viewpoint, if that's your thing - not least the apparently fairly accurate portrayal of what a complete self-centred prick he was, as well as a great explorer - but overall it's just not very good as a film... the pacing is all over the place, there's really not that much drama even in the bits which should actually have been quite intense, and it's over-dramatised in others where it doesn't need to be. There might even have been some truth in the depiction of the British as cartoonish villains, but it seemed contrived and unnecessary.
5/10
(iPlayer)
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
(iPlayer)
It’s a very good looking film( bar a little bit of obvious CGI) and apart from ‘man who got to the South Pole first’ I didn’t know any of the story and it is an interesting story. I just struggled to be gripped by it as film, I think one of those biopics that tries to be just that rather than taking a smaller part of the story and exploring ( no pun intended) the drama within.