It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Cheers
My T64v is great.
I did try an acoustic several years ago that I didn't much like- it was one of the cheaper all-solid more modern-style ones. However, it was on offer and it was an older model and I suspect it was just a bad one that the shop was trying to get rid of. (Or the older ones weren't as good.) Kind of annoyed, that put me off them for years and I suspect that was a one-off.
Probably worth trying a newer one, just in case your experience was similar to mine.
A few months back I bought a T64 with Bigsby and it's absolutely bloody brilliant. Same excellent build quality, the relic work is brilliantly done, and the Lollar P90s absolutely sing! Yes, the nut is a bit wider than my other guitars but now I've given it a proper bit of adaptation time I don't even notice it.
Definitely won't be moving this one on any time soon!
I know people say it's not a problem (or even that noticeable) but we're all different. Despite being a porky-trottered little swine, I really don't like wide nut widths. I'm fine finger picking on standard-width acoustics and maybe playing a bit of mandolin helps. I don't have any problem on my 40mm wide Casino.
It's confusing as some models have the regular Gibson width and others have the wider 1 3/4" nut. I'd love a T64 but, frustratingly, they come with the wider nut width. (Although I have read somewhere that there are more recent models appearing in the USA with a narrower nut width.)
I don't know why they seem to go to great lengths to cop a lot of the vintage Gibson vibe and then go and muck about with a key specification (for me). I can only assume that there are a lot of sausage fingered Texans who love the wide necks. I suppose they should be applauded for offering a choice but it's annoying that you can't get some models with the standard width.
I do have great respect for Eastman's quality though. I've had a couple of their mandolins and I still have an all mahogany 12-fret OO size acoustic that's a great little thing. My friend had a really nice OM from them that wasn't even one of the higher spec. models.
https://www.peachguitars.com/eastman-sb59-v-antique-black.htm?opt=40340
No longer though,I think the Eastman is way better..Seriously..
I have heart problems,I don't want a boulder of a thing either.
So tidily well built and playable,the little stripes on the binding..
I own 5 Gibsons at the Moment...So I'm not just saying that out of inexperience..
Even the Kent Armstrong Pickups on the one I have,it kind of suits the instrument..
The String Spacing at the nut was slightly wider,I got that altered to Gibson spacing,
apart from that I haven't adapted anything,nor do I want to..
I had one of the higher end Les Paul copies,a SB59 V Anique Classic....
Not as good as any of my Les Pauls..
I would say my Les Paul Tribute budget Job was better to play than the Eastman..
Also the neck heel on the Eastman LP was just plain silly,it restricted upper neck access...
I liked the Lollar Pickups though..I now have a set and the same caps on one of my own Les Pauls..
I like the cheaper Eastmans without the ageing and upmarket features much better I think..
The T386 and the attention to detail is ridiculous,if only Gibson built them that well..
Oh and the Bridges don't rattle like Epiphones..
having dabbled deeply with modifying Epiphones,I think they are a bit of a dead end..
I am keeping my Sheraton with Jescar Evo Frets,quality electrics and Seymour Seth Lover and Custom Custom Pickup...
I spent a fortune on it in reality,but it has a great feel and sound..
The Eastman is in another League entirely though..
I also have the Gibson ES175 copy the Eastman AR 372 ce,,really nice guitar..
I just don't play it much Sadly..
That's my experience..
If I was shopping now I'd probably look around for a used Eastman at that price, but I can't honestly say that it would be a better guitar
My D'Angelico had a rattling bridge. One of the saddles was rocking. It didn't affect the amplified sound but I play it unplugged around the house a lot and it was bugging me
I sent them a video of the problem and they posted me a new bridge under warranty. Great service
A wonderful guitar, at any price.
Really stable, superb relic, fantastic specs, and gorgeous sounding and lovely to play.
Highly recommended.
https://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/248848/fs-eastman-t64-v-t-gb-sold#latest
I don’t find the nut width troublesome and the build quality is very hard to fault.
My advice is go and try one.
But I do understand how even that could annoy some people (e.g. @Basher ). For a good number of years there after I started playing, I could only really play on 43mm or wider! I'm a bit better now but I still notice it. It's definitely a very important thing, and very, very annoying when a guitar is perfect apart from the nut width...
Yeah that's fair enough.
I would say though that (a) I wouldn't really compare Eastman to other Chinese-made stuff, at least any I've tried and (b) those prices are basically standard pricing. As I said, if you shop around you can get them for a lot less. You can get the Antiquity-loaded 335-alike for under £1400 (new) if you shop around. Also (c) if you're willing to go used on the Gibson you could (presumably) go used on the Eastman for even less...
That's still no consolation if you don't like it, of course.
That's very interesting that you like the cheaper ones better @KevS . The main reason I'm looking at the dearer ones is I'm not sure if I'm up to a pickup swap in a semi-hollow! I just about managed my Patrick Eggle Vienna, but it was a pain and only has two knobs and a switch, all of which were really close to the F-hole...