It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Ah, I was just about to post this!
"The Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) summit on Thursday placed all 300 species of rosewood under trade restrictions, meaning criminals can no longer pass off illegally logged species as legitimate."
Not just Brazilian any more.
There's things I've had, there's things I wanna have"
Stuff on Appendix 1 (Brazilian Rosewood) is essentially completely off limits.
I think the other stuff can be traded with the appropriate paperwork. It does depend on whether they are on Appendix 2 or 3.
The article says: Some rosewood species can still be logged under the new rules, but will require permits that should only be granted if it is deemed sustainable.
There is plantation grown rosewood in some parts of the world so I think there will be some available at least.
However you look at this, prices will go up and real rosewood will probably only be on high end guitars. Makes me wonder if I should go out and buy a couple of Martin D28s as an investment.
Not pedals though. Just guitars.
Someone talk to the Swedish and get them to export Ikea to China.
Anyway, this is a sign of things to come. Mahogany will be next...
There is plantation grown rosewood in some parts of the world so I think there will be some available at least.
The problem is once it is on a guitar how do you know what is what
CITIES is a massive can or worms - many web articles reiterate this especially a few USA articles from vintage dealers and journalist - From a green point of view I fully appreciate we need to protect wildlife, be it plant or animals and have no issues with such measures providing they are fully implemented
The issue now is that it is all very unclear - A 1962 Strat with a Brazilian fingerboard is made pre-CIties - However if it is now imported from a USA dealer/private seller to the UK or EU it now requires a cities certificate and without this certificate it can be confiscated at the point of entry to the UK - Ivory has now caused issues on pre WW11 Martins to the point that in the USA it is illegal to sell them in certain states but not others - Dealers like Gruhns simply state that in this instance they won't sell to that state or country as it is not worth the hassle - I adopt a similar policy in that if a customer in Australia wanted a PRS with Brazilian Rosewood neck, I could not guarantee seizure at customs, so best just to leave it - the hassle of getting paperwork is not worth it
Pernambuco is now on the cities listing and just about every serious violin player has a pernambuco bow - many have ivory tips on the bows - This has already caused problems on touring pro players - A recent incident at German customers with a Japanese touring pro muso, meant a violin and bow was confiscated and the Jap government had to get involved to release the goods
The cities statement is about commercial gains, so that includes gigging and selling - Mark Knopfler had an issue on a tour with customs clearance - Santana won't tour his Brazilian PRS out of the USA
To me the easy answer is place the appropriate cities bans on select woods, inlays etc as required from today's date, but allow all goods made before that date to be freely available, be it touring or selling - That is not currently the case - I can currently sell a PRS Modern Eagle with Brazilian Rosewood to any EU country, as there is no border control (yet) but could not even return it to the USA for a warranty repair without paperwork, wildlife and fisheries inspection and other issues that might mean it is seized
If you had say a 200 year old hairbrush with an ivory or tortoiseshell handle it is legal to own and sell as it is an antique - Yet if you decided to break this down and utilise the ivory for a top nut or tortoiseshell for inlays it instantly becomes illegal
#prayforrosewood
It does beg the question of how the next generation of the True Historic Gibsons are going to be "the most accurate yet"
There's things I've had, there's things I wanna have"
On another tangent, for Fender fans, alder and maple will never become rare.
Thats why a Fender is always going to be superior... ;-)
(Runs away, puts on tin hat and jumps into hastily created trench and awaits the flaming arrows....)
If the thread on Gibson's finances is anything to go by we probably won't be seeing a next generation of any Gibsons.
It should not be a problem.
Martin now have the technology to make a whole guitar out of highly compressed mouse droppings.
The Brazilian rosewood thing is made worse by the EU though. Pre 1992 rosewood isn't actually covered by CITES - the fact that you can't legally import a '65 Strat is down to EU idiocy being added on top. This is why you can still sometimes buy limited run PRS with Brazilian rosewood in the US (which abides by CITES) but not in the EU which has the extra rules.
Hopefully our government will do away with the EU idiocy when we leave.
The stupid thing is that if you made the trade legal with the correct documentation there would be an incentive for people to plant the stuff so their grandchildren could get rich, and it wouldn't just get burnt down.
I don't think they will ever stamp out small scale use of rosewood - especially as you correctly said once it's in a completed item there's no way of knowing the source, but I think this will make it more difficult to chop the stuff down on an industrial scale.