It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
My current band bus was £1,500 with 63k on it.
I know modern cars are good for higher miles, but nearly 100k is half fucked in anyone's language.
I suspect it'll get the brush off because 'French'.
- He's been looking for his next car at DFS? To be fair, they do have big carparks.
- He's decided that the seats in DFS are more comfortable than in a CRZ, so he's now buying a sofa (on wheels, obvs).
?or
Fast, practical, stylish, and the inside of it looks more like an aircraft cockpit than any other car I've been in, which might appeal to @Emp_Fab
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
First day in new job and @Emp_Fab is late for work because he missed his bus connection.
I don't think £6K is expensive for a CRZ with 95K on the clock. It's the going rate. "Expensive" is relative TO the going rate. Other similar ones are going for the same, more or less.
Plus 95K isn't knackered for a well looked after Honda VTEC engine. That's only just been run-in by Honda standards!
Offset "(Emp) - a little heavy on the hyperbole."
Offset "(Emp) - a little heavy on the hyperbole."
In the past I've had three Saab 9-5s and a couple of 9-3s, couldn't fault any of them. My favourite was a 9-3 Aero convertible, very quick, comfortable and reasonable rear seats although access was a little tricky. Here's one just up the road from you:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Saab-9-3-2-0-T-Auto-2009-Vector-Sport-Convertible-74K-Miles-FSH-Immaculate/132973932290?hash=item1ef5dd2f02:g:NOAAAOSwQXxce7Oh
(nothing to do with me btw)
But you want "a car". It appears from the last 18 pages that you're not too fussed on exactly which make, model or spec.
£6k might not be expensive for a CRZ with 95k miles, but it's an expensive option if you just want "a car".
There are - IMHO, and the opinion of many others here - many better options. Yes, Honda build quality, but 95k miles on any high-revving engine is going to result in some wear & tear. Some significant wear & tear. Plus, expected life of many components is a factor of both age and mileage. Stuff is going to be getting to end-of-life. You're going to be replacing lots of bits. Or your local Honda garage will be.
With £6k in your pocket, you've got a choice of a wide range of boring but cheap to run/maintain and relatively young options. The Hyundai (et al) options.
Or you could go nutty and splash it on something fun with a V6/V8, but that's going to cost you in running costs (tax, fuel, insurance, maintenance) and has a higher risk of a big repair bill at some point.
Or, or, or, etc. You don't seem to have decided on diesel vs petrol, large vs small, fun vs boring, etc, etc, etc. Unless you've now determined that a CRZ the other side of the country is the choice that ticks your boxes.
We can all make suggestions, because there are many options out there that will tick all the boxes that we'd have. You have to decide what your boxes are.
With £6k in my pocket, I'd be buying a Mk2 TT. TFSI model.
Look carefully and you'll get FASH, ~60k miles, younger than the CRZ, a way more relaxing drive with more poke, better kit, better reliability, lower costs and fewer rattles (whether from the car or your bones).
But those are my boxes.
I don't doubt it's the going rate, I just meant that I wouldn't want to spend £6k and still be looking at imminent replacements of suspension bushes, calipers, shocks and sundry other tedious bits and pieces.
For me, £6k means you can pretty well ignore your car and get on with your life for at least a couple of years, not lying under it freeing off stuck bolts for the MOT.