It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Jon
My trading feedback: https://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/210335/yorkie
I was replying to crunchman's comment that big club bias may have been a factor in Grealish not starting.
Harry Kane was poor as well and why he's captain I'll never understand. Not one touch in the box or shot on goal from a world class striker is mind-boggling.
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
Great tournament for you, but in the end it just came down to experience. Italy have a very mature squad, they know how to handle pressure, manage a game etc.... They are unbeaten in 34 games now, it's astonishing.
If England can keep the younger players playing, and hopefully not crucify them after this, it may come good yet.
Remember Italy didn't even qualify for the World Cup just a few years ago!
Quite funny that for all the talk about the team being set up more defensively, that the goal was scored by our number three after a charging attacking run from Trippier.
Not sure what the slating of Mount and Rice is about, I think they have had a very good tournament. Tbh, they all have, we just came up short against a revitalised Italian team.
The choice of penalty takers was a bit bizarre though.
Not sure about the idea of starting with Grealish. He is a cracking option to have on the bench as he does change the game, most of the time, but not every time.
Very disappointed this morning, but not really surprised.
On another note. Looks like the Italians are on the wind up now.
"Football has come home"
Cynical absolutely, but that's part of the game. If it's within the rules it can't be cheating regardless of whether the act is unsavoury or not.
@GoldenEraGuitars
Are people thinking it's acceptable that we didn't have a shot for he last 118 minutes of the 120? At Wembley, in front of our own crowd?
And as for Southgate saying they practised penalties regularly - so Sancho and Saka practice hitting them halfway between centre and post about 3 feet off the ground so it's ideal for a keeper?
We will literally never get a better chance.
'Sure was a great start but a sac a crap at the end'
I suppose the rules could be changed but most fouls of this type don't result is something that looks so dramatic and football injuries tend to be studs to leg or elbow to head, I can't really think of any examples where somebody has been injured by their shirt. IT did look bad and I'm not defending it, it's just not common enough in this extreme to completely change the rules.
Either way, if this classifies as a reason not to watch football the same could be applied to any sport, all sports have an unsavory side and many sports with dangers have things far more dangerous that go unpunished . IMO.
As an England fan I'm not sore about it, what it says to me as Saka had got past him is he should have come on earlier. Chiellini on a yellow and Saka running at them could have caused more problems.
Leaving a 19yo - who has never taken a penalty at senior level - to take penalty number 5 (so that he has the whole shootout to put pressure on himself) whilst senior players and supposed "generational talent" like Sterling and Grealish stand around looking at the floor looks more and more insane by the minute. Poor kid.
That right there may have been the issue!