It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
:-S
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Not necessarily. Friend of mine just put his 1 bed flat on the market and has put on offer on a house around the corner from where he is currently. He's older than I am to be fair, but he's played it fairly well.
We got our Agreement in Principle last night. Looks like this could very well be happening.
Still unsure about this particular place though.
I'm actually quite into the idea now. I've come around. The thing that is on my mind right now is room treatment for sound.
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
I know modern flats are built on a show string these days and if you fall, you will go straight through the internal walls.
Small developer flat conversions are often like rooms in a bedsit with no acoustic insulation whatsoever with the only thing separating you from your neighbour being and plasterboard, floorboards and joists.
However, if you can get a purpose built, 90's era pre cast concrete flat that has sectional concrete floors and ceilings on piers and decent acoustically insulated walls, it gives you more volume room. Often the brick clad OAP retirement flats are pretty good.
Don't overlook leasehold if you can extend the lease for a hundred years to add value and the roof etc won't be your concern, even if you do have to pay a few thousand in ground rent every year. You can usually do any improvements if the landlord will give you permission. After all many of these flats won't even be here in a hundred years, so freehold is pretty stupid anyway.
I have never understood the desire to get a freehold flat to be honest, but obviously it depends on the set up. Usually you just get a tonne of problems and responsibilities for the money and if the block gets a demolition order, there is nothing you can do about it, even if you own it and you'll receive a paltry sum as compensation.
Also don't understand why you can secure a £400,000 mortgage for something that is essentially built like a multi-storey car park or might be in a high rise block that is nearing the end of it's designed lifespan, but can't even get £20,000 for a Reema or timber house, even when the plot alone is worth the same as the house.
What's your definition of last? Do they fall down after 25 years or just need lots of items renewing?
All the workman I know will refer to new builds from the last 20 odd years as lego houses etc etc but just curious as to the long term of modern housing?
I have no vested interest in the outcome as my house is early 60's and built using good construction technique and materials according to the structural engineer who did all the calculations on a couple of steels that were put in.
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
Certainly in terms of the energy market we will continue to get squeezed on prices which will force more and more the issue of energy efficiency and renewable sources, any property owner that hasn't had significant upgrades in this department will find themselves with a hefty energy bill each year.
The thing is efficiency isn't always balanced with longevity, energy efficiency can be obtained with pretty basic materials and all major constructors look for ways to improve profitability, cutting down on construction times is a massive earner for them.
Why plaster a wall when you can tape and joint it? Why screw something when it can be glued? Why use brick when preformed timber panels with cladding can do the same job?