It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Everyone should understand the straw man argument since it's the most common annoying response that people make when they hear an opinion which signals the speaker is not 'on their team':
- I agree with the right to choose.
- I see. You think it's okay to kill babies.
- I believe in stricter immigration controls on the southern border.
- Okay, you hate foreigners.
Sometimes it's willful. The responder purposefully twists a speaker's comment to characterize their opposing viewpoint not just as mistaken, but typically as evil or cruel. At other times, I think it really is plain stupidity - the responder can only see issues in terms of binary opposites with no grey areas in between. Whichever it is, when someone does a straw man, it's a clear sign for me to back out of any further discussion with that person. Nothing good can come of it!
Fun fact, when asked in job interviews why you want to work in healthcare, don't tell them that /\ /\, they react really weirdly!!!
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
Next ten years? State pension, more arse grapes and joint pain are pretty good bets.
The rate of glacial decline here in ch is scary, most have visibly receded in the 15 years I've been here. Water will become a major issue for Europe very soon if the mild winters and hot summers continue..
You didn't study under a guy named Shipman by any chance did you?
He said "fallacy".
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
(sssshhhhhh!)
But one child is pretty good. You have done your bit. Congratulations! People with three and four and five children who scold other people about flights and ICE cars are unbelievably entitled and stupid.
So how much of the current global heating trend is human caused? More than 100% of it. Yes, more than 100% because sudden human impacts such as deforestation and fossil fuel use have overpowered the much slower natural trend in the opposite direction. Plucking a number out of the air to provide some very rough sense of scale, call it 101% human causes.
I wonder if there's any truth in the theory that maybe Mars was once populated, a very long time ago, and they fucked up their environment like we are doing here, and the atmosphere went, the oceans dried up and all life went with it ?
Chips are "Plant-based" no matter how you cook them
Donald Trump needs kicking out of a helicopter
I'm personally responsible for all global warming
Chips are "Plant-based" no matter how you cook them
Donald Trump needs kicking out of a helicopter
I'm personally responsible for all global warming