It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
G2.1u vs G2.1nu...what is the difference ie in the nu. Is it just n ?
G7.1ut...watched one of these go for a song on ebay the other day...£57!! The G2.1s are going for more than that often!
I believe there is also a G9 or summit....do all of these share the same amp modelling? My reason for suddenly being interested in these were watching some guy on youtube playing his Strat Plus thru on of these and was sounding great...always passed on the Zooms in the past years back when I started getting into multi FX boxes and went down the Boss GT road the older zooms were plastic (but still sounded good)...I believe they're now metal these dayseses. Advise me on teh zoom G's!!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
But as the fellow above says, the G3 is a good unit and would encourage me to try other Zoom stiff definitely. I know on the G3 the Bassman and Vibro amp models are amongst my favourites of any unit I've used. If you set any of these up well from scratch rather than tweaking the presets, you can make them sound very good indeed
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
The G3 is fantastic value, but it's worth noting that the pitch shifting functions are not nearly as good as most of the other effects- poor note tracking and horrible tone. The tuner wasn't much cop either. Everything else was good enough that I managed to gig for the better part of a year with my band using just the G3 and a Polytune.
Eventually I switched to some analogue drive pedals and my Delaylab because I thought the Delaylab might give me some extra delay sounds but there isn't a lot it can do that the G3 can't. Overall tone is probably a bit better with separate pedals, but at the cost of a whole bunch of features on the G3. Horses for courses, YMMV etc.
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
The G3 seems to have had lots of good feedback. I understand that patch changing is fast,it has a 40 sec looper (20 secs in undo mode) and connectivity options are also good - plus it can even run on batteries in an emergency which could be handy if anything happened to the power-adapter. Haven't tried one yet, but am thinking of getting the G3X (with the expression treadle and latest v2.0 firmware) so a few questions if I may re build quality and functionality from a gigging perspective:
- I believe the G3 has a metal case, and the foot-switches are reportedly decent - would you guys class its build as 'gigworthy'?
- Fast, easy switching on stage via a single button press is a must for me - the G5 (that I have tried) was a nightmare when switching between presets and stomp mode. I've had a look at the manual and watched some vids but I'm still unclear here; is the G3 similarly cumbersome or does it allow fast changes between patches and stomp mode? Logically it should do because its laid out as 3 stomp pedals, but I'd appreciate any clarification you can give me.
- I know that to move along screens to tweak the next three stomp effects you have to scroll by bending down & pressing a button or holding two footswitches down simultaneously (awkward). Its not a deal breaker but can this be done by connecting external switches e.g I have a couple of latching switches - could these be used to control certain functions more easily in the G3X?
If there are any other gigging bug bears you've found, or if there's other good gigging features to emphasise, please do let me know your thoughts.Finally, Andertons are selling the Zoom G3X at £129 and the Pod HD300 at £149. For those with experience of both which do you think is better from a) tone/amp modelling and build quality perspective and b) gigability and ease of use on stage?
Patch switching is a little cumbersome if you use the G3 like a regular MFX, switching between patches with multiple effects. It's better suited to use as a sort of "virtual pedalboard" like the M9/M13. The problem with that is that with the v2 firmware each patch has up to 6 effects but the unit can only show three at a time, meaning you can only control three at a time without scrolling through the screens. v2 lets you do this with the footswitches, or mods exist to allow you to use an external footswitch (with unlatched switches).
Other than that I found gigging and rehearsal with the G3 pretty painless. It does a ton of stuff but it's very intuitive and very simple to learn.
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
It's a pedal. It does the pedal thing well, but if you want it to give you an entire new rig four times in every song like some 90s Prince wannabe you'll need to look elsewhere and spend a fair bit more.
I'm currently using it as an effects box, but used it direct to desk as an amp modeller for 18 months, which it's surprisingly good at. As is usual with these things you need to set up your patches alongside a favourite amp so you can constantly A/B it, but it sounds good at high volume and feels right, even for someone who favours a simple sound and uses the guitar controls a lot.
It's one of those rare "just right" bits of kit for me, which I would definitely buy again.
Gt-100 is the king of giggable for me.
I'd part with mine if you were interested
I use mine live as a DI box and FX unit for acoustic guitar. I have it set up on one patch with three effects to choose from (compressor, modulated delay, EQ), plus wah if I want to be silly. It works very well for this application.
The only downside from a DI point of view is the lack of a pad switch, although the global volume control control helps in this regard.
Also it runs off batteries if there is no mains handy, which can be useful.
Nomad
Nobody loves me but my mother... and she could be jivin' too...