It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
As I am not Tom Petty i will back down.
The term was originally an appellation for wine but has been bandied around so often in the guitar world it has no meaning.
No one talks of a vintage Marlin do they and yet they must be around thirty years old now?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
The comic book industry has "ages" to describe the different eras of production;
The Golden Age - late 1930's to mid 50's.
There's also a sort of pre-Golden age, to cover everything that happened before comic-buying exploded in popularity with Superman and Batman in 1938/39 - and the ages keep growing, of course. I remember when the mere idea of a Bronze Age was deemed utterly ridiculous, but it's definitely here now ...and the Copper Age must surely be on its way.
Perhaps the guitar community could adopt something similar?
An 85 Les Paul is nothing special and you could buy one for less than you would pay for a new one . An 85 PRS will probably cost 3 times the cost of a new one. I'm not certain that I'd call the PRS Vintage though.
I think the wine argument about things being declared vintage because it is a good year has some bearing. Should something as horrible as a late 70's Strat ever be called vintage? Or the Martin purists will look down on anything between 68 (or thereabouts - I may be a year out) and 88 because the bridge plate is made from the wrong material.