It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I honestly thought it was a piss-take first time I saw it.
I'm still not sure, there's a bit of spinal tap about it.
I've only seen bits of it though tbf.
I would have probably preferred another series to the film format but great stuff.
End of vampire film discussion : )
It was quite good.
This won the 2022 Palme D'Or, which is kind of ironic seeing it appears to me to be a pretty unsubtle poke at the super-wealthy and superficiality of glamour. There's one or two laughs but otherwise it's just farcical, silly and a bit odd.
It's pretty slow going...a lot of the scenes are drawn out well beyond their shelf-life. Not sure why this had to be 2hrs 20m; cutting 30 minutes or even more would've had little impact.
We watched it to the end though I'm not sure what to make of it.
It's about a 5/10 at best for me.
Mouth of Madness starts well as I recall but then loses its way (it's been years since I've seen it).
By the time Snake Plissken is on a surfboard I'm out.
I'm just grateful for what we got from Carpenter in the golden years from Assault on Precinct 13 ('76) to They Live ('88)
Fog, Halloween, Escape From New York, The Thing, Big Trouble in Little China, Prince of Darkness....
(I can't believe I've never seen Christine or Starman).
I quite like Gosling - not a great actor but he's got a bit of charm about him sometimes, though sadly there's none of it in this.
2 hours of sub-Bond machismo with gratuitous guns, knives, explosions, car/helicopter crashes, etc...
The plot (if you can call it that) is really irrelevant. The usual array of cardboard cutout villains and other cliched supporting characters.
The budget for this must've been huge. How does this trash get made?
Avoid, unless mindless action is your schtick
2/10