It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Which is what you can pretty much boil this pointless thread down to, really.
(turns out that “strictly” was something of a misrepresentation, and not at all what I’d hoped it might be, but that’s another thread).
Wish I’d watched Strictly.
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
So do I
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
As such, I agree with the definition above. Clapton clearly isn’t a poor guitarist - his playing isn’t riddled with mistakes or bad timing…I just find his note choice restricted and uninspired.
His playing doesn’t seem to have evolved over the years, it’s not as melodic or harmonically interesting as many others in his field.
Caveat: ….in my opinion.
And define 'better'.
It's not a competition.
The fact you find that music bland is maybe more of a failing on your part than Clapton's.
Just sayin'....